Toward a system of cancer screening in the United States: trends and opportunities
- PMID: 15760301
- DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144703
Toward a system of cancer screening in the United States: trends and opportunities
Abstract
The hard work of public health officials, physicians, and disease advocacy groups to educate Americans about the importance of early detection has resulted in uptake of screening tests at levels equivalent to or higher than in countries with organized cancer screening programs. However, the societal costs of high screening rates are larger in the United States than in other countries, including higher prices for screening, more unnecessary testing, and inefficiencies in delivery, especially in small practices. Further, screening rates are not evenly distributed across population groups, and the national expenditure on clinical and community research to promote cancer screening among individuals has not been matched by research efforts that focus on policy or clinical systems to increase screening widely throughout the population. We identify opportunities for organizational change that improve access to use, improve quality, and promote cost effectiveness in cancer screening delivery.
Similar articles
-
A perspective from countries using organized screening programs.Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5 Suppl):1201-13. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20505. Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15316915 Review.
-
Access to cancer screening for women with long-term mental health problems.Aust Nurs J. 2007 Nov;15(5):26. Aust Nurs J. 2007. PMID: 18044238 No abstract available.
-
A qualitative assessment of the referral system at district level in Zimbabwe: implications on efficiency and effective delivery of health services.Cent Afr J Med. 1998 Apr;44(4):93-7. Cent Afr J Med. 1998. PMID: 9810401
-
A national framework for cancer surveillance in the United States.Cancer Causes Control. 2005 Mar;16(2):151-70. doi: 10.1007/s10552-004-3487-5. Cancer Causes Control. 2005. PMID: 15868456
-
Cancer screening and health system resilience: keys to protecting and bolstering preventive services during a financial crisis.Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.060. Epub 2012 Mar 15. Eur J Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22424881 Review.
Cited by
-
Opportunities and challenges for the use of large-scale surveys in public health research: a comparison of the assessment of cancer screening behaviors.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jan;24(1):3-14. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0568. Epub 2014 Oct 9. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015. PMID: 25300474 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Screening practices in cancer survivors.J Cancer Surviv. 2007 Mar;1(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s11764-007-0007-0. J Cancer Surviv. 2007. PMID: 18648941
-
Eliminating disparities in cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results: what will it take?J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 Feb;22(1):83-100. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0023. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011. PMID: 21317508 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing disparities in colorectal cancer mortality by socioeconomic status using new tools: health disparities calculator and socioeconomic quintiles.Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Feb;28(2):117-125. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0842-2. Epub 2017 Jan 12. Cancer Causes Control. 2017. PMID: 28083800 Free PMC article.
-
An examination of the psychosocial factors influencing colorectal cancer patients' communication of colorectal cancer patient risk with their siblings.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Nov;18(11):2907-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2558. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009. PMID: 19900939 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources