Validity of composite end points in clinical trials
- PMID: 15761002
- PMCID: PMC554039
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.330.7491.594
Validity of composite end points in clinical trials
Abstract
Use of composite end points as the main outcome in randomised trials can hide wide differences in the individual measures. How should you apply the results to clinical practice?
Figures
References
-
- Freemantle N, Calvert M, Wood J, Eastaugh J, Griffin C. Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? JAMA 2003;289: 2554-9. - PubMed
-
- TIME Investigators. Trial of invasive versus medical therapy in elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease (TIME): a randomised trial. Lancet 2001;358: 951-7. - PubMed
-
- Taylor DW, Barnett HJ, Haynes RB, Ferguson GG, Sackett DL, Thorpe KE, et al. Low-dose and high-dose acetylsalicylic acid for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomised controlled trial. ASA and Carotid Endarterectomy (ACE) Trial Collaborators. Lancet 1999;353: 2179-84. - PubMed
-
- Niewoehner D, Erbland M, Deupree R, Collins D, Gross N, Light R, et al. Effect of systemic glucocorticoids on exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340: 1941-7. - PubMed
-
- Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000;342: 145-53. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources