Maximizing reimbursement from trauma response fees (UB-92: 68X) - lessons learned from a hospital comparison
- PMID: 15761340
- DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000157821.42380.55
Maximizing reimbursement from trauma response fees (UB-92: 68X) - lessons learned from a hospital comparison
Erratum in
- J Trauma. 2005 Nov;59(5):1276-7
Abstract
Background: The trauma response fee (UB-92:68x) recently has been approved, to be used by hospitals to cover expenses resulting from continuous trauma team availability. These charges may be made by designated trauma centers for all defined trauma patients when notification has been received before arrival (eligible pt). This study compares two trauma centers' performance in collecting this fee help define methodologies that can enhance reimbursement.
Methods: Our trauma system uses two hospitals (A and B) that are designated as the Level I trauma center for the region on alternate years. This allows hospital performance comparisons with relatively consistent patient demographics, injury severity, and payer mix. Data were collected for a one-year period beginning on January 1, 2003 and included charges, collections, and payer source for the trauma response fee. This time frame allowed the comparison of two six-month sequential periods at each trauma center.
Results: Out of a total of 871 trauma patients, 625 were eligible for the trauma response fee (72%): hospital A = 65% and hospital B = 77%. Total trauma response fee charges for both centers were 1,111,882 dollars with collections of 319,684 dollars (28.8%). The following payer sources contributed to the collections: Indemnity insurance (77.4%), Managed Care (22.1%), Medicare (0.3%), and Medicaid (0.2%). No collections were obtained from any self-pay patient. Eligible patients were charged a trauma response fee much less frequently in Hospital A than B (29.35% versus 95.2%) but revenue / charge ratios were equivalent at both hospitals (0.32 versus 0.28). These differences resulted in markedly enhanced revenue for each eligible patient in Hospital B compared with A (735 dollars versus 174 dollars)
Conclusions: Enhanced collection by hospital B was a result of a higher charge, compulsive billing of all eligible patients, and emphasis on pre-admission designation of trauma patients. Effective billing and collection process related to trauma response fees results in substantial additional revenue for the trauma center without additional expense.
Similar articles
-
Survey of national usage of trauma response charge codes: an opportunity for enhanced trauma center revenue.J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1352-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c3fdd4. J Trauma. 2009. PMID: 20009689
-
The devil is in the details: maximizing revenue for daily trauma care.Surgery. 2008 Oct;144(4):670-5; discussion 675-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.012. Surgery. 2008. PMID: 18847653
-
Orthopaedic traumatology: the hospital side of the ledger, defining the financial relationship between physicians and hospitals.J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Apr;22(4):221-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815e92e5. J Orthop Trauma. 2008. PMID: 18404029
-
Financial and speed collections.Plast Surg Nurs. 2003 Fall;23(3):135, 137. doi: 10.1097/00006527-200323030-00010. Plast Surg Nurs. 2003. PMID: 14666811 Review. No abstract available.
-
Revenue Cycle: From Billing to Collections.Hand Clin. 2024 Nov;40(4):459-466. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 Jun 21. Hand Clin. 2024. PMID: 39396325 Review.
Cited by
-
Variation in Trauma Team Response Fees in United States Trauma Centers: An Additional Undisclosed Variable Cost in Trauma Care.Cureus. 2022 Jan 31;14(1):e21776. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21776. eCollection 2022 Jan. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35251846 Free PMC article.
-
Rates of insurance for injured patients before and after health care reform in Massachusetts: a possible case of double jeopardy.Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun;104(6):1066-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301711. Epub 2014 Apr 17. Am J Public Health. 2014. PMID: 24825208 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources