Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Apr;40(2):577-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00373.x.

A comparison of clinically important differences in health-related quality of life for patients with chronic lung disease, asthma, or heart disease

Kathleen W Wyrwich  1 , William M Tierney, Ajit N Babu, Kurt Kroenke, Fredric D Wolinsky
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of clinically important differences in health-related quality of life for patients with chronic lung disease, asthma, or heart disease

Kathleen W Wyrwich et al. Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: On the eight scales of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), Version 2, we compared the clinically important difference (CID) thresholds for change over time developed by three separate expert panels of physicians with experience in quality of life assessment among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and heart disease.

Study design: We used a modified Delphi technique combined with a face-to-face panel meeting within each disease to organize and conduct the consensus process among the expert panelists, who were familiar with the assessment and evaluations of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures among patients with the panel-specific disease.

Principal findings: Each of the expert panels first determined the magnitude of the smallest numerically possible change on each SF-36 scale, referred to as a state change, and then built their CIDs from this metric. All three panels attained consensus on the scale changes that constituted small, moderate, and large clinically important SF-36 change scores. The CIDs established by the heart disease panel were generally greater than the CIDs agreed on by the asthma and COPD panels.

Conclusions: These panel-derived thresholds reflect possible differences in disease management among the represented panel-specific diseases, and are all greater than the minimal CID thresholds previously developed for the SF-36 scales among patients with arthritis. If confirmed among patients with the relevant diseases and those patients' physicians, these disease-specific CIDs could assist both researchers and practicing clinicians in the use and interpretation of HRQL changes over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinically Important Difference Levels for Change over Time on the Eight Scales of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2, Established by Three Expert Panels of Physicians (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD], Asthma, and Heart Disease)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Esdaile JM, Fam AG, Kean WE, Thompson JM, Wells GA, Campbell J. “Ankylosing Spondylitis Antirheumatic Trials. III. Setting the Delta for Clinical Trials of Anti-Rheumatic Drugs–Results of a Consensus Development (Delphi) Exercise.”. Journal of Rheumatology. 1991;8:1716–22. - PubMed
    1. Brazier J, Harper R, Jones N. “Validating the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: New Outcome Measure for Primary Care.”. British Medical Journal. 1992;305:160–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brook R, Chassin M, Fink A, Solomon D, Kosecoff J, Park R. “A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical Technologies.”. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1986;2:53–63. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 2003. “Medicare Health Outcomes Survey Cohort III Performance Measurement Report” [accessed on June 21, 2004]. Available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/surveys/hos/download/HOS_Sample-PMR_C3.pdf.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.

Publication types

MeSH terms