Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Oct;20(5):371-84; discussion 385-7.
doi: 10.1023/b:caim.0000041938.45383.a4.

Color-encoded semiautomatic analysis of multi-slice first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison to tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography perfusion and X-ray angiography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Color-encoded semiautomatic analysis of multi-slice first-pass magnetic resonance perfusion: comparison to tetrofosmin single photon emission computed tomography perfusion and X-ray angiography

Holger Thiele et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion can accurately detect coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the absence of efficient, easy-to-use and reliable image analysis software is an obstacle to its introduction into clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate new color-encoded semiautomatic software for analysis of first-pass CMR perfusion in comparison to tetrofosmin myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), using X-ray angiography as the standard of truth for the detection of CAD.

Methods: Thirty-two patients underwent both SPECT and CMR perfusion at rest and adenosine stress. Twenty of these patients also underwent X-ray angiography. Off-line CMR image analysis consisted of six steps to generate a color display of the myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI). The MPRI color-maps were analyzed visually and compared to SPECT.

Results: In comparison to X-ray angiography overall accuracy was 87% for CMR and 77% for SPECT perfusion to detect significant CAD (stenosis > or =70%). In comparison with SPECT sensitivity was 80%, specificity 91%, and the overall agreement 89% for CMR.

Conclusions: Post-processing of CMR perfusion data using new semiautomatic software to generate and display the MPRI visually as color-encoded images is feasible and fast. In this study it yielded higher accuracy than SPECT to detect significant CAD on X-ray angiography. Correlation between SPECT and CMR accuracy for detection of perfusion defects was high. This method may accelerate the time-consuming analysis of CMR perfusion data, thus enabling a more widespread clinical utility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Circulation. 1987 Dec;76(6):1183-9 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 16;329(12 ):855-63 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Feb;13(2):192-200 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Jun;11(6):607-15 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1285-93 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources