Barriers to patient self-testing of prothrombin time: national survey of anticoagulation practitioners
- PMID: 15767240
- DOI: 10.1592/phco.25.2.265.56949
Barriers to patient self-testing of prothrombin time: national survey of anticoagulation practitioners
Abstract
Oral anticoagulation with warfarin requires routine monitoring of prothrombin time, expressed as the international normalized ratio (INR). Patient self-testing for INR is common in Europe but not in the United States. In order to determine the frequency of INR self-testing among patients whose anticoagulant therapy is managed in U.S. anticoagulation clinics, to describe the processes that support this self-testing, and to identify the barriers as experienced by anticoagulation clinic providers, a three-part survey was mailed to 538 anticoagulation specialists in the United States. The response rate was 43.7%. Policies and procedures of almost 60% of anticoagulation clinics prohibited INR self-testing for enrolled patients. In addition, less than 1% of patients being managed by U.S. anticoagulation clinics use self-testing to obtain INR results. Primary barriers were the cost of self-testing instruments (78.7% of respondents), cost of reagent cartridges (60.4%), and fear that self-testing might lead to unintended self-management (35.7%). Over 75% of respondents believed that some reimbursement for the cost of self-testing devices and supplies would increase the likelihood that anticoagulation clinics would recommend INR self-testing.
Similar articles
-
Quality assurance program for whole blood prothrombin time-international normalized ratio point-of-care monitors used for patient self-testing to control oral anticoagulation.Thromb Res. 2004;113(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.01.009. Thromb Res. 2004. PMID: 15081563 Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of patient capability to self-adjust oral anticoagulant dose: a multicenter study on home use of portable prothrombin time monitor (COAGUCHECK).Haematologica. 2000 Aug;85(8):826-31. Haematologica. 2000. PMID: 10942929
-
The North American experience with patient self-testing of the INR.Semin Vasc Med. 2003 Aug;3(3):295-302. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-44466. Semin Vasc Med. 2003. PMID: 15199463 Review.
-
Feasibility, cost-effectiveness and patients' acceptance of point-of-care INR testing in a hospital-based anticoagulation clinic.Ann Hematol. 2008 Nov;87(11):905-10. doi: 10.1007/s00277-008-0530-8. Epub 2008 Jul 5. Ann Hematol. 2008. PMID: 18604535
-
Home prothrombin time monitoring: a literature analysis.Am J Hematol. 2004 Oct;77(2):177-86. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20161. Am J Hematol. 2004. PMID: 15389909 Review.
Cited by
-
Is patient self-testing a good thing?J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010 Feb;29(2):214-8. doi: 10.1007/s11239-009-0414-3. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010. PMID: 19902148 No abstract available.
-
Micro-mechanical blood clot testing using smartphones.Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 11;13(1):831. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28499-y. Nat Commun. 2022. PMID: 35149711 Free PMC article.
-
Patient barriers and solutions for INR self-testing.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008 Feb;25(1):14-5. doi: 10.1007/s11239-007-0100-2. Epub 2007 Sep 27. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008. PMID: 17898931 No abstract available.
-
The cost effectiveness of anticoagulation management services for patients with atrial fibrillation and at high risk of stroke in the US.Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(10):1021-33. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624100-00009. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006. PMID: 17002484
-
Practice nursed-based, individual and video-assisted patient education in oral anticoagulation--protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Apr 10;12:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-17. BMC Fam Pract. 2011. PMID: 21477372 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical