Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Mar 28;92(6):1001-5.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602423.

Patient motivations surrounding participation in phase I and phase II clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy

Affiliations

Patient motivations surrounding participation in phase I and phase II clinical trials of cancer chemotherapy

Z A Nurgat et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Successful advances in the treatment of advanced malignant diseases rely on recruitment of patients into clinical trials of novel agents. However, there is a genuine concern for the welfare of individual patients. The aim of this study was to examine motives of patients entering early clinical trials of novel cancer therapies. Questionnaire survey with both open- and close-ended questions. The patients were surveyed after they had given informed consent and before or during the first cycle of treatment. In all, 38 phase I/II trial patients participated and completed the survey. Obtaining possible health benefit was listed by 89% as being a 'very important' factor in their decision to participate, with only 17% giving reasons of helping future cancer patients and treatment. Other items cited as a 'very important' motivating factor were 'trust in the doctor' (66%), 'being treated by the latest treatment available' (66%), 'better standard of care and closer follow-up' (61%), and 'closer monitoring of patients in trials' (58%). Only 47% patients indicated that someone had explained to them about any 'reasonable' alternatives to the trial. In total, 71% strongly agreed that 'surviving for as long time as possible was the most important thing (for them)'. Nearly all (97%) indicated that they knew the purpose of the trial and had enough time to consider participation in the trial (100%). In this survey, most patients entering phase I and II clinical trials felt they understood the purpose of the research and had given truly informed consent. Despite this, most patients participated in the hope of therapeutic benefit, although this is known to be a rare outcome in this patient subset. Trialists should be aware, and take account of the expectations that participants place in trial drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Albrecht TL, Blanchard C, Ruckdeschel JC, Coovert M, Strongbow R (1999) Strategic Physician Communication and Oncology Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol 17: 3324–3332 - PubMed
    1. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W (1987) False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 17: 20–24 - PubMed
    1. Bain NSC, Campbell NC, Ritchie LD, Cassidy J (2002) Striking the right balance in colorectal cancer care – a qualitative study of rural and urban patients. Fam Pract 19: 369–374 - PubMed
    1. Cheng JD, Hitt J, Koczwara B, Shulman KA, Burnett CB, Gaskin DJ, Rowland JH, Meropol NJ (2000) Impact of quality of life on patient expectations regarding phase I clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 18: 421–428 - PubMed
    1. Cox K (2002) Informed consent and decision making: patients' experiences of the process of recruitment to phase I and phase II anti-cancer trials. Patient Educ Couns 46: 31–38 - PubMed