Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Apr;76(4):503-8.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.040436.

Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial

P M van Vliet et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: Bobath based (BB) and movement science based (MSB) physiotherapy interventions are widely used for patients after stroke. There is little evidence to suggest which is most effective. This single-blind randomised controlled trial evaluated the effect of these treatments on movement abilities and functional independence.

Methods: A total of 120 patients admitted to a stroke rehabilitation ward were randomised into two treatment groups to receive either BB or MSB treatment. Primary outcome measures were the Rivermead Motor Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Secondary measures assessed functional independence, walking speed, arm function, muscle tone, and sensation. Measures were performed by a blinded assessor at baseline, and then at 1, 3, and 6 months after baseline. Analysis of serial measurements was performed to compare outcomes between the groups by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) and inserting AUC values into Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: Comparison between groups showed no significant difference for any outcome measures. Significance values for the Rivermead Motor Assessment ranged from p = 0.23 to p = 0.97 and for the Motor Assessment Scale from p = 0.29 to p = 0.87.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in movement abilities or functional independence between patients receiving a BB or an MSB intervention. Therefore the study did not show that one approach was more effective than the other in the treatment of stroke patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2369-75 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1999 Jul 17;354(9174):191-6 - PubMed
    1. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Aug;14(4):361-9 - PubMed
    1. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jul;82(7):961-8 - PubMed
    1. Clin Rehabil. 2001 Aug;15(4):398-414 - PubMed

Publication types