Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section
- PMID: 15777443
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00336.x
Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section
Erratum in
- BJOG. 2005 Apr;112(4):528
Abstract
Background: The issues related to safety of induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section remain controversial. The main adverse outcome fuelling this debate is a "small" risk of uterine rupture that is potentially devastating for both the mother and the fetus.
Objective: To estimate the risk of uterine rupture or dehiscence in women who require induction of labour with previous caesarean sections.
Design: Five year retrospective review of computerised hospital records and case note review of index cases.
Setting: Large inner city teaching hospital.
Population: Two hundred and five women who had their labour induced with history of one lower segment caesarean section.
Methods: This study was conducted at Liverpool Women's Hospital, a tertiary referral centre, with approximately 6000 births per annum. We searched the hospital's computerised records of deliveries from June 1997 to June 2002 and reviewed all indications and outcomes of induction of labour in women with one previous caesarean section. Women with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation were then divided into three groups: those with one previous caesarean section and no previous vaginal deliveries, those whose last delivery was a caesarean section but had delivered vaginally before and those whose last delivery was by vaginal route, but had had one caesarean section in the past.
Main outcome measures: Uterine rupture or dehiscence, adverse neonatal outcome.
Results: Two hundred and five women were included. There were four cases of uterine rupture and one dehiscence (2.4%, 95% CI 0.8-5.6%). Two babies were profoundly acidotic at birth, but all five neonates were healthy when discharged from hospital with no long term morbidity. All five cases occurred in the group of women with no previous vaginal deliveries. The intrauterine pressure catheter recordings had contributed to the diagnosis of uterine rupture/dehiscence in three out of five cases.
Conclusion: In women with previous caesarean section and no vaginal deliveries, induction of labour carries a relatively high risk of uterine rupture/dehiscence despite all precautions, including intrauterine pressure monitoring.
Comment in
-
Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.BJOG. 2005 Dec;112(12):1668-9; author reply 1669. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00781.x. BJOG. 2005. PMID: 16305580 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risk of uterine rupture following induction of labour in women with a previous caesarean section in a large UK teaching hospital.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Apr;24(3):264-5. doi: 10.1080/01443610410001660751. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004. PMID: 15203621
-
Vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section in a tertiary institution in Nigeria.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Nov;24(8):886-90. doi: 10.1080/01443610400018742. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004. PMID: 16147643
-
Rupture of the uterine scar during term labour: contractility or biochemistry?BJOG. 2005 Jan;112(1):38-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00300.x. BJOG. 2005. PMID: 15663395
-
Review of vaginal birth after primary caesarean section without prostaglandin induction and or syntocinon augmentation in labour.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Apr;23(4):281-5. doi: 10.3109/14767050903067394. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010. PMID: 19968589 Review.
-
Induction of labour with previous caesarean delivery: where do we stand?Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;18(6):636-41. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280105a4e. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006. PMID: 17099335 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence of uterine rupture among women with one prior low transverse cesarean and women with unscarred uterus undergoing labor induction with PGE2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 6;16(7):e0253957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253957. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34228760 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic correction of the uterine muscle loss in the scar after a Caesarean section delivery.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013 Dec;8(4):342-5. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2013.39514. Epub 2013 Dec 18. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2013. PMID: 24501605 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of caesarean delivery services and documentation in first-line referral facilities in Afghanistan: a chart review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Mar 15;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-14. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012. PMID: 22420615 Free PMC article.
-
How does uterine contractile activity affect the success of trial of labour after caesarean section, and the risk of uterine rupture? An exploratory, blinded analysis of a cohort from a randomised controlled trial.BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):976-984. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17005. Epub 2021 Nov 30. BJOG. 2022. PMID: 34773355 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A French retrospective study.PLoS One. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):e0237132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237132. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32764773 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous