Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Apr 16;330(7496):877-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38404.650208.AE. Epub 2005 Mar 18.

A feasibility study of signed consent for the collection of patient identifiable information for a national paediatric clinical audit database

Patricia A McKinney  1 , Samantha Jones, Roger Parslow, Nicola Davey, Mark Darowski, Bill Chaudhry, Charles Stack, Gareth Parry, Elizabeth S Draper; PICANet Consent Study Group
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A feasibility study of signed consent for the collection of patient identifiable information for a national paediatric clinical audit database

Patricia A McKinney et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the feasibility of obtaining signed consent for submission of patient identifiable data to a national clinical audit database and to identify factors influencing the consent process and its success.

Design: Feasibility study.

Setting: Seven paediatric intensive care units in England.

Participants: Parents/guardians of patients, or patients aged 12-16 years old, approached consecutively over three months for signed consent for submission of patient identifiable data to the national clinical audit database the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet).

Main outcome measures: The numbers and proportions of admissions for which signed consent was given, refused, or not obtained (form not returned or form partially completed but not signed), by age, sex, level of deprivation, ethnicity (South Asian or not), paediatric index of mortality score, length of hospital stay (days in paediatric intensive care).

Results: One unit did not start and one did not fully implement the protocol, so analysis excluded these two units. Consent was obtained for 182 of 422 admissions (43%) (range by unit 9% to 84%). Most (101/182; 55%) consents were taken by staff nurses. One refusal (0.2%) was received. Consent rates were significantly better for children who were more severely ill on admission and for hospital stays of six days or more, and significantly poorer for children aged 10-14 years. Long hospital stays and children aged 10-14 years remained significant in a stepwise regression model of the factors that were significant in the univariate model.

Conclusion: Systematically obtaining individual signed consent for sharing patient identifiable information with an externally located clinical audit database is difficult. Obtaining such consent is unlikely to be successful unless additional resources are specifically allocated to training, staff time, and administrative support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Stationery Office. Health and Social Care Act. 2001. www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2001/20010015.htm (accessed 23 February 2005).
    1. Willison DJ, Keshavjee K, Nair K, Goldsmith C, Holbrook AM, for the COMPETE investigators. Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data. BMJ 2003;326: 373-7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verity C, Nicholl A. Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance. BMJ 2002;324: 1210-3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coleman MP, Evans BG, Barrett G. Confidentiality and the public interest in medical research—will we ever get it right? Clin Med 2003;3: 219-28. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types