How complete and accurate is meningococcal disease notification?
- PMID: 15779802
How complete and accurate is meningococcal disease notification?
Abstract
Effective public health control of meningococcal disease (meningococcal meningitis and septicaemia) is dependent on complete, accurate and speedy notification. Using capture-recapture techniques this study assesses the completeness, accuracy and timeliness of meningococcal notification in a health authority. The completeness of meningococcal disease notification was 94.8% (95% confidence interval 93.2% to 96.2%); 91.2% of cases in 2001 were notified within 24 hours of diagnosis, but 28.0% of notifications in 2001 were false positives. Clinical staff need to be aware of the public health implications of a notification of meningococcal disease, and of failure of, or delay in notification. Incomplete or delayed notification not only leads to inaccurate data collection but also means that important public health measures may not be taken. A clinical diagnosis of meningococcal disease should be carefully considered between the clinician and the consultant in communicable disease control (CCDC). Otherwise, prophylaxis may be given unnecessarily, disease incidence inflated, and the benefits of control measures underestimated. Consultants in communicable disease control (CCDCs), in conjunction with clinical staff, should de-notify meningococcal disease if the diagnosis changes.
Similar articles
-
Invasive meningococcal disease: completeness and timeliness of reporting of confirmed cases in Thames Valley, 2006-2007.Public Health. 2009 Dec;123(12):805-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.10.015. Public Health. 2009. PMID: 19958917
-
The incidence of meningococcal illness in the East Anglian Regional Health Authority: 1990-1991.Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1994 Jul 22;4(8):R85-90. Commun Dis Rep CDR Rev. 1994. PMID: 7522803
-
Invasive meningococcal disease in Austria 2002: assessment of completeness of notification by comparison of two independent data sources.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006 Feb;118(1-2):31-5. doi: 10.1007/s00508-005-0502-0. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006. PMID: 16489523
-
Meningococcal infection.Nurs Stand. 2001 Oct 31-Nov 6;16(7):47-53; quiz 54-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2001.10.16.7.47.c3110. Nurs Stand. 2001. PMID: 11974830 Review.
-
Meningococcal disease.Nurs Stand. 1998 Oct 21-27;13(5):49-52; quiz 55-6. doi: 10.7748/ns1998.10.13.5.49.c2546. Nurs Stand. 1998. PMID: 9919188 Review.
Cited by
-
Using linked birth, notification, hospital and mortality data to examine false-positive meningococcal disease reporting and adjust disease incidence estimates for children in New South Wales, Australia.Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Sep;143(12):2570-9. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814003355. Epub 2015 Jan 9. Epidemiol Infect. 2015. PMID: 25573266 Free PMC article.
-
Capture-recapture analysis to estimate the incidence of invasive meningococcal disease in Germany, 2003.Epidemiol Infect. 2007 May;135(4):657-64. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806007151. Epub 2006 Aug 29. Epidemiol Infect. 2007. PMID: 16938141 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Record-linkage and capture-recapture analysis to estimate the incidence and completeness of reporting of tuberculosis in England 1999-2002.Epidemiol Infect. 2008 Dec;136(12):1606-16. doi: 10.1017/S0950268808000496. Epub 2008 Mar 17. Epidemiol Infect. 2008. PMID: 18346285 Free PMC article.
-
A dynamic estimation of the daily cumulative cases during infectious disease surveillance: application to dengue fever.BMC Infect Dis. 2010 May 27;10:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-136. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20504379 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical