Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Jun;90(6):3387-91.
doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2510. Epub 2005 Mar 22.

Eight-point glucose testing versus the continuous glucose monitoring system in evaluation of glycemic control in type 1 diabetes

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Eight-point glucose testing versus the continuous glucose monitoring system in evaluation of glycemic control in type 1 diabetes

Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

Context: Advantages/disadvantages of continuous vs. discrete glucose monitoring are not well documented.

Objective: Compare glucose profiles from home meters vs. continuous sensors.

Design: Randomized clinical trial conducted by the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) to assess the utility of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer.

Setting: Home glucose measurements.

Patients: Two hundred children (age, 7 to < 18 yr) with type 1 diabetes.

Intervention: At baseline, subjects were asked to wear the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) sensor and perform meter tests at eight prespecified times of the day (eight-point testing) each for 3 d (2 d using both, 1 d eight-point testing only, 1 d CGMS only). Hemoglobin A1c was measured in a central laboratory.

Main outcome measure: Six-month hemoglobin A1c. This analysis looked at baseline glucose profiles/hemoglobin A1c.

Results: Only 10% of subjects completed full eight-point testing for 3 d, but median CGMS use was 70 h. Mean glucose was lower when measured by the CGMS compared with eight-point testing (183 +/- 37 vs. 188 +/- 41 mg/dl; 10.2 +/- 2.1 vs.10.4 +/- 2.3 mmol/liter; P = 0.009), especially overnight (2400-0400 h; 174 vs. 199 mg/dl; 9.7 vs. 11.1 mmol/liter; P < 0.001). Associations of hemoglobin A1c with mean glucose were similar for eight-point testing [slope 23 mg/dl per 1% (1.3 mmol/liter); correlation 0.40; P < 0.001] and CGMS [slope 19 mg/dl per 1% (1.1 mmol/liter); correlation 0.39; P < 0.001]. Postprandial excursions were lower for eight-point testing vs. CGMS, especially after dinner (mean excursion -17 vs. 63 mg/dl; -1.0 vs. 3.5 mmol/liter; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Both methods gave similar mean glucose profiles and associations with hemoglobin A1c. Advantages of the CGMS were higher density of data and better detection of postprandial peaks. However, the CGMS may overestimate the frequency of low glucose levels, especially overnight.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms