Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider
- PMID: 15785881
- DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0907-2
Diagnosis-related group assignment in laparoscopic and open colectomy: financial implications for payer and provider
Abstract
Purpose: In carefully matched patients, the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic colectomy is shorter than after open surgery. Higher operating room costs for laparoscopic surgery are offset by lower costs for hospitalization because of less utilization of pharmacy, laboratory, and nursing services. Clinical outcome is comparable. We examined the effect of the surgical approach for colectomy (open vs. laparoscopic) regarding the reasons for disease-related group assignment to disease-related group 148, and institutional cost under Part A of the U.S. Medicare system.
Methods: Colectomy patients were assigned to either disease-related group 148 (colorectal resection with complications) or disease-related group 149 (colorectal resection without complications) with significant institutional reimbursement implications (disease-related group 149, US 8,310 dollars; disease-related group 148, US 20,291 dollars). A total of 100 consecutive disease-related group 148 patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy from July 2000 to September 2002 were identified from a prospective database and case-matched with 100 patients undergoing open colectomy. Patients were matched for gender, age, operative procedure, and pathology. A certified coder determined the reason(s) for disease-related group 148 assignment, which were grouped into: preoperative comorbidity, a combination of preoperative comorbidity/postoperative complications, or postoperative complications alone.
Results: Significantly more lapararoscopy patients were assigned to disease-related group 148 solely because of preoperative comorbidities (62 percent vs. 21 percent; P < 0.0001). Significantly more patients in the open surgery group were classified as disease-related group 148 solely because of postoperative complications (22 percent vs. 42 percent; P < 0.0001). An additional group of patients were assigned to the disease-related group 148 category based on a combination of preoperative and postoperative diagnoses (16 percent vs. 37 percent). The mean direct hospital costs were significantly less for laparoscopy patients (US 3971 dollars vs. US 5997 dollars; P = 0.0095). Increased cost to Part A of Medicare for 20 open surgery patients who "migrated" to disease-related group 148 because of postoperative complications was US 239,620 dollars.
Conclusions: Our data are the first to demonstrate that disease related group assignment can change solely because of a differential rate of postoperative complications for two competing operative techniques. This change occurred at twice the rate for open colectomy and resulted in significantly increased cost to the insurer under a prospective payment program. The savings to the institution coupled with the shortened length of stay offset the potential loss in revenue to the institution.
Similar articles
-
Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy.Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):975-81. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0941-0. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005. PMID: 15793638
-
Money well spent: a comparison of hospital operating margin for laparoscopic and open colectomies.Surgery. 2007 Oct;142(4):546-53; discussion 553-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.014. Surgery. 2007. PMID: 17950347
-
Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):819-24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d950e. Ann Surg. 2008. PMID: 18438119
-
Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: review of results in 752 patients.Gastroenterologist. 1995 Mar;3(1):75-89. Gastroenterologist. 1995. PMID: 7743123 Review.
-
Cost comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy and open nephrectomy: analysis of individual parameters.J Urol. 2003 Sep;170(3):752-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000080567.51241.2e. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12913690 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgical treatment for rectal cancer: an international perspective on what the medical gastroenterologist needs to know.World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun 7;14(21):3281-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3281. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. PMID: 18528924 Free PMC article. Review.
-
DRG migration: A novel measure of inefficient surgical care in a value-based world.Am J Surg. 2018 Mar;215(3):493-496. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.035. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Am J Surg. 2018. PMID: 29117915 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing cost and short-term outcomes for elderly patients in laparoscopic colonic surgery.Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4463-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3088-z. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23877762
-
How Patient Complexity and Surgical Approach Influence Episode-Based Payment Models for Colectomy.Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jun;62(6):739-746. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001372. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019. PMID: 30855307 Free PMC article.
-
Surgeon Experience and Medicare Expenditures for Laparoscopic Compared to Open Colectomy.Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):1036-1042. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002312. Ann Surg. 2018. PMID: 28549007 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources