Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Feb;23(1):14-24.

Evaluation of inter- and intrafraction organ motion during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer measured by a newly developed on-board image-guided system

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15786747

Evaluation of inter- and intrafraction organ motion during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer measured by a newly developed on-board image-guided system

Keith R Britton et al. Radiat Med. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate prostatic organ motion at both setup and intrafraction using an onboard image-guided system. An intrafraction field-based repositioning method also was evaluated.

Materials and methods: A dual fluoroscopy with amorphous-silicon flat panel (DFFP) system was used for the three-dimensional registration of implanted markers in the prostate of eight organ-confined cancer patients planned for treatment with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Day-to-day motion errors were quantified and intrafraction displacements of more than +/-1 mm were corrected.

Results: Among 214 fractions and 565 system views, day-to-day mean magnitude of marker discrepancy +/- standard deviation (SD) was 1.76 +/- 1.4 mm, 3.14 +/- 1.6 mm, and 3.78 +/- 2.4 mm in the right-left, cranial-caudal, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. The intrafractional mean magnitude +/- SD of marker displacement was 0.45 +/- 0.7 mm, 1.08 +/- 1.38 mm and 1.45 +/- 1.70 mm in the right-left, cranial-caudal, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. Intrafraction corrected sessions (84/214) showed a median (range) of motion of 0.1 mm (-1.2 to 0.7 mm), -0.2 mm (-2.1 to 1.1 mm), and -0.2 mm (-1.7 to 2.0 mm) in the right-left, cranial-caudal, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively.

Conclusion: Motion uncertainty can be considerably decreased with daily use of the DFFP system. Reduced intrafraction organ motion clearly endorsed the value of the repositioning approach, allowing a safer dose escalation protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources