Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Mar-Apr;3(2):159-66.
doi: 10.1370/afm.285.

Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review

John W Saultz  1 , Jennifer Lochner
Affiliations
Review

Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review

John W Saultz et al. Ann Fam Med. 2005 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: We wanted to undertake a critical review of the medical literature regarding the relationships between interpersonal continuity of care and the outcomes and cost of health care.

Methods: A search of the MEDLINE database from 1966 through April 2002 was conducted by the primary author to find original English language articles focusing on interpersonal continuity of patient care. The articles were then screened to select those articles focusing on the relationship between interpersonal continuity and the outcome or cost of care. These articles were systematically reviewed and analyzed by both authors for study method, measurement technique, and quality of evidence.

Results: Forty-one research articles reporting the results of 40 studies were identified that addressed the relationship between interpersonal continuity and care outcome. A total of 81 separate care outcomes were reported in these articles. Fifty-one outcomes were significantly improved and only 2 were significantly worse in association with interpersonal continuity. Twenty-two articles reported the results of 20 studies of the relationship between interpersonal continuity and cost. These studies reported significantly lower cost or utilization for 35 of 41 cost variables in association with interpersonal continuity.

Conclusions: Although the available literature reflects persistent methodologic problems, it is likely that a significant association exists between interpersonal continuity and improved preventive care and reduced hospitalization. Future research in this area should address more specific and measurable outcomes and more direct costs and should seek to define and measure interpersonal continuity more explicitly.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Saultz JW. Continuity of care. In: Saultz JW, ed. Textbook of Family Medicine. 1st ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000:52–77.
    1. McWhinney IR. Principles of family medicine. In: McWhinney IR, ed. A Textbook of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1997:18–20.
    1. Committee on the future of primary care. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. 1st ed. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine: National Academy of Sciences; 1996.
    1. Stange KC. In this issue: continuity of care. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:130–131.
    1. Emanuel EJ, Dubler NN. Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care. JAMA. 1995;273:323–329. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources