Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 years: police power and civil liberties in tension
- PMID: 15798112
- PMCID: PMC1449223
- DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.055152
Jacobson v Massachusetts at 100 years: police power and civil liberties in tension
Abstract
A century ago, the US Supreme Court in Jacobson v Massachusetts upheld the exercise of the police power to protect the public's health. Despite intervening scientific and legal advances, public health practitioners still struggle with Jacobson's basic tension between individual liberty and the common good. In affirming Massachusetts' compulsory vaccination law, the Court established a floor of constitutional protections that consists of 4 standards: necessity, reasonable means, proportionality, and harm avoidance. Under Jacobson, the courts are to support public health matters insofar as these standards are respected. If the Court today were to decide Jacobson once again, the analysis would likely differ--to account for developments in constitutional law--but the outcome would certainly reaffirm the basic power of government to safeguard the public's health.
Similar articles
-
Manifold restraints: liberty, public health, and the legacy of Jacobson v Massachusetts.Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):571-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.055145. Am J Public Health. 2005. PMID: 15798111 Free PMC article.
-
Jacobson v Massachusetts: it's not your great-great-grandfather's public health law.Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):581-90. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.055160. Am J Public Health. 2005. PMID: 15798113 Free PMC article.
-
Individual rights versus the public's health--100 years after Jacobson v. Massachusetts.N Engl J Med. 2005 Feb 17;352(7):652-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048209. N Engl J Med. 2005. PMID: 15716558 No abstract available.
-
Abuse of quarantine authority. The case for a federal approach to infectious disease containment.J Leg Med. 2003 Jun;24(2):199-214. doi: 10.1080/713832158. J Leg Med. 2003. PMID: 12775408 Review. No abstract available.
-
Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995. J Leg Med. 1995. PMID: 8568420 Review.
Cited by
-
Partner notification in the context of HIV: an interest-analysis.AIDS Res Ther. 2015 May 5;12:15. doi: 10.1186/s12981-015-0057-8. eCollection 2015. AIDS Res Ther. 2015. PMID: 25945119 Free PMC article.
-
Manifold restraints: liberty, public health, and the legacy of Jacobson v Massachusetts.Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):571-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.055145. Am J Public Health. 2005. PMID: 15798111 Free PMC article.
-
Autonomy, paternalism, and justice: ethical priorities in public health.Am J Public Health. 2008 Jan;98(1):15-21. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.110361. Epub 2007 Nov 29. Am J Public Health. 2008. PMID: 18048780 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Social and Structural Determinants of Health Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Older Adults in the United States.Vaccines (Basel). 2024 May 10;12(5):521. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12050521. Vaccines (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38793773 Free PMC article.
-
Taken to court: defending public health authority to access medical records during an outbreak investigation.Public Health Rep. 2015 May-Jun;130(3):278-83. doi: 10.1177/003335491513000315. Public Health Rep. 2015. PMID: 25931633 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Jacobson v Massachussets, 197 US 11 (1905).
-
- Tobey JA. Public Health Law. 2nd ed. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund; 1939:355.
-
- Gostin LO. Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint. Berkeley, Calif, and New York, NY: University of California Press and Milbank Memorial Fund; 2000:66.
-
- Lochner v New York, 198 US 45 (1905).
-
- Editorial. New York Times. February 22, 1905.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical