Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Dec;202(3):161-70.
doi: 10.1007/s00232-004-0727-2.

Opposite Cx32 and Cx26 voltage-gating response to CO2 reflects opposite voltage-gating polarity

Affiliations

Opposite Cx32 and Cx26 voltage-gating response to CO2 reflects opposite voltage-gating polarity

K C Young et al. J Membr Biol. 2004 Dec.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the V(j)-dependent gating behavior of gap junction channels is altered by CO(2) exposure. V(j)-dependent channel closure is increased by CO(2) in some connexin channels and decreased in others. Since the former type of channels gate on the relatively negative side by V(j) (negative gaters) and the latter at the positive side (positive gaters), it has been hypothesized that gating polarity determines the way CO(2) affects V(j) closure. To test this hypothesis, we have studied the CO(2)-mediated changes in V(j) gating in channels made of Cx32, Cx26, or a Cx32 mutant (Cx32-N2D) in which asparagine (N) at position 2 was replaced with aspartate (D). With exposure to CO(2), Cx32 channels (negative gaters) show increased V(j)-dependent closure, whereas Cx26 channels (positive gaters) respond in the opposite way to V(j). Additionally, Cx32-N2D channels (positive gaters) show decreased V(j) closure with exposure to CO(2). The reciprocal Cx26 mutant, Cx26-D2N (negative gater), could not be tested because it did not express functional homotypic channels. The data support the hypothesis that polarity of fast V(j) gating determines whether CO(2) increases or decreases the V(j) dependent closure of gap junction channels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004 Mar 23;1662(1-2):42-60 - PubMed
    1. J Membr Biol. 2003 Sep 1;195(1):53-62 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 1;89(9):3820-4 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1994 Mar 24;368(6469):348-51 - PubMed
    1. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Jan 22;243(1306):5-11 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources