Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Mar;42(2):128-33.
doi: 10.1093/jmedent/42.2.128.

Insect contribution to horizontal transmission of Reticuloendotheliosis virus

Affiliations

Insect contribution to horizontal transmission of Reticuloendotheliosis virus

Irit Davidson et al. J Med Entomol. 2005 Mar.

Abstract

The involvement of insects in Reticuloendotheliosis virus (REV) transmission was examined by testing insects trapped at commercial farms and by controlled feeding experiments using mosquitoes, Culex pipiens L. and house flies, Musca domestica L. We established sensitive methods of REV detection, including reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for REV-LTR and REV-gag genes, REV antigenemia measurements by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and virus isolation in tissue cultures. A variety of blood-sucking species of insects were trapped at farms with infected poultry and tested, but none were positive. To rule out the possibility of PCR inhibition by insect RNA, spiking experiments were conducted and no interference was observed. Because Cx. pipiens mosquitoes were trapped frequently at farms, we performed feeding experiments with mosquito females fed on a REV-containing tissue culture medium and chicken blood mixture. Virus was detected in the mosquitoes up to 5 h postfeeding, compared with 96 h in the feeding mixture, indicating that Cx. pipiens can only harbor REV for a short period. House flies were suspected to be involved in the virus transmission because they frequently were trapped on positive farms. In contrast to mosquitoes, REV was harbored within the house fly digestive tract for up to 72 h and could infect chickens, as demonstrated by seroconversion and by detection of viral gag-sequence in the cloaca. The current study is supportive for the role of house flies as a mechanical vector of REV among poultry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aly M. M., Smith E. J., Fadly A. M. 1993. Detection of reticuloendotheliosis virus infection using the polymerase chain reaction. Avian Pathol. 22: 543–554. - PubMed
    1. Bagust T. J., Grimes T. M. 1979. Experimental infection of chickens with an Australian strain of reticuloendotheliosis virus. 2. Serological responses and pathogenesis. Avian Pathol. 8: 375–389. - PubMed
    1. Bagust T. J., Grimes T. M., Ratnamohan N. 1981. Experimental infection of chickens with an Australian strain of reticuloendotheliosis virus. 3. Persistent infection and transmission by the adult hen. Avian Pathol. 10: 375–385. - PubMed
    1. Braverman Y., Rubina M. 1976. Light trapping of biting insects in poultry houses in Israel. Isr. J. Zool. 25: 95–101.
    1. Braverman Y., Chizov-Ginzburg A., Saran A., Winkler M. 1999. The role of house flies (Musca domestica) in harboring Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in dairy herds in Israel. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 18: 681–690. - PubMed

MeSH terms