Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):365-76.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1822. Epub 2005 Mar 31.

Clinical decision support in electronic prescribing: recommendations and an action plan: report of the joint clinical decision support workgroup

Affiliations

Clinical decision support in electronic prescribing: recommendations and an action plan: report of the joint clinical decision support workgroup

Jonathan M Teich et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Clinical decision support (CDS) in electronic prescribing (eRx) systems can improve the safety, quality, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of care. However, at present, these potential benefits have not been fully realized. In this consensus white paper, we set forth recommendations and action plans in three critical domains: (1) advances in system capabilities, including basic and advanced sets of CDS interventions and knowledge, supporting database elements, operational features to improve usability and measure performance, and management and governance structures; (2) uniform standards, vocabularies, and centralized knowledge structures and services that could reduce rework by vendors and care providers, improve dissemination of well-constructed CDS interventions, promote generally applicable research in CDS methods, and accelerate the movement of new medical knowledge from research to practice; and (3) appropriate financial and legal incentives to promote adoption.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003; Public. law no. 108–173, 117 Stat. 2066.
    1. Braden BJ, Corritore C, McNees P. Computerized decision support systems: implications for practice. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;46:300–4. - PubMed
    1. Langton KB, Johnson ME, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. A critical appraisal of the literature on the effects of computer-based clinical decision systems on clinician performance and patient outcomes. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:626–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perrault LE, Metzger JB. A practical framework for understanding clinical decision support. J Healthcare Inf Manage. 1999;13:5–21.
    1. Osheroff JA, Pifer EA, Sittig DF, Jenders RA, Teich JM. Clinical decision support implementers' workbook. Chicago: HIMSS, 2004 (available from: www.himss.org/cdsworkbook). (Second edition: Improving outcomes with clinical decision support: an implementers' guide; HIMSS, 2005.)

Publication types

MeSH terms