Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):431-7.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1788. Epub 2005 Mar 31.

A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease

Thomas D Sequist  1 , Tejal K Gandhi, Andrew S Karson, Julie M Fiskio, Donald Bugbee, Michael Sperling, E Francis Cook, E John Orav, David G Fairchild, David W Bates
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease

Thomas D Sequist et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of an integrated patient-specific electronic clinical reminder system on diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD) care and to assess physician attitudes toward this reminder system.

Design: We enrolled 194 primary care physicians caring for 4549 patients with diabetes and 2199 patients with CAD at 20 ambulatory clinics. Clinics were randomized so that physicians received either evidence-based electronic reminders within their patients' electronic medical record or usual care. There were five reminders for diabetes care and four reminders for CAD care.

Measurements: The primary outcome was receipt of recommended care for diabetes and CAD. We created a summary outcome to assess the odds of increased compliance with overall diabetes care (based on five measures) and overall CAD care (based on four measures). We surveyed physicians to assess attitudes toward the reminder system.

Results: Baseline adherence rates to all quality measures were low. While electronic reminders increased the odds of recommended diabetes care (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.67) and CAD (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.55), the impact of individual reminders was variable. A total of three of nine reminders effectively increased rates of recommended care for diabetes or CAD. The majority of physicians (76%) thought that reminders improved quality of care.

Conclusion: An integrated electronic reminder system resulted in variable improvement in care for diabetes and CAD. These improvements were often limited and quality gaps persist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Electronic clinical reminders are displayed within the main patient summary screen of the electronic medical record system. Physicians are able to view the reminders in conjunction with other pertinent patient information including active medical problems, medications, and allergies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Burden of Chronic Diseases and Their Risk Factors. National and State Perspectives, 2004. February 2004. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/burdenbook2004./ Accessed May 26, 2005.
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Quality Report. Available from: http://qualitytools.ahrq.gov/qualityreport/download_report.aspx./ Accessed May 26, 2005.
    1. Bates DW, Ebell M, Gotlieb E, Zapp J, Mullins HC. A proposal for electronic medical records in U.S. primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodenheimer T, Grumbach K. Electronic technology: a spark to revitalize primary care? JAMA. 2003;290:259–64. - PubMed

Publication types