The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication
- PMID: 15803075
- DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157483.28505.e3
The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication
Abstract
Study design: The spinal canal and neural foramina dimensions of cadaver lumbar spines were quantified during flexion and extension using magnetic resonance imaging before and after placement of an interspinous process implant.
Objective: To quantify the effect of the implant on the dimensions of the spinal canal and neural foramina during flexion and extension.
Summary of the background data: Lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication symptoms are typically exacerbated during extension and relieved during flexion. It is understood that the dimensions of the spinal canal and neural foramen increase in flexion and decrease in extension. The authors hypothesized that an interspinous process implant would significantly prevent narrowing of the canal and foramina in extension and have no significant effect in flexion.
Methods: Eight L2-L5 specimens were positioned to 15 degrees of flexion and 15 degrees of extension using a positioning frame. Each specimen was magnetic resonance imaged with and without an interspinous implant (X STOP) placed between the L3-L4 spinous processes. Canal and foramina dimensions were compared between the intact and implanted specimens using a repeated measures analysis of variance with a level of significance of 0.05.
Results: In extension, the implant significantly increased the canal area by 18% (231-273 mm), the subarticular diameter by 50% (2.5-3.7 mm), the canal diameter by 10% (17.8-19.5 mm), the foraminal area by 25% (106-133 mm), and the foraminal width by 41% (3.4-4.8 mm).
Conclusions: The results of this study show that the X STOP interspinous process implant prevents narrowing of the spinal canal and foramina in extension.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical study of dynamic changes in L4-L5 foramen surface area in flexion and extension after implantation of four interspinous process devices.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.11.016. Epub 2015 Feb 23. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015. PMID: 25736197
-
Neurogenic intermittent claudication in lumbar spinal canal stenosis: the clinical relationship between the local pressure of the intervertebral foramen and the clinical findings in lumbar spinal canal stenosis.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Apr;22(2):130-4. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318167b054. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009. PMID: 19342935
-
Lumbar intersegmental spacing and angulation in the modified lateral decubitus position versus variants of prone positioning.Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 30. Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19482515
-
Biomechanics and Mechanism of Action of Indirect Lumbar Decompression and the Evolution of a Stand-alone Spinous Process Spacer.Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(Suppl 2):S14-S22. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz129. Pain Med. 2019. PMID: 31808533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interspinous process decompression (IPD) system (X-STOP) for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:265-75. Surg Technol Int. 2006. PMID: 17029185 Review.
Cited by
-
Greater than 5-year follow-up of outpatient L4-L5 lumbar interspinous fixation for degenerative spinal stenosis using the INSPAN device.J Spine Surg. 2020 Sep;6(3):549-554. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-547. J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 33102891 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes.Eur Spine J. 2009 Sep;18(9):1355-62. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1068-8. Epub 2009 Jun 19. Eur Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19543753 Free PMC article.
-
Three-Dimensional Volumetric Changes and Clinical Outcomes after Decompression with DIAM™ Implantation in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases.Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 21;56(12):723. doi: 10.3390/medicina56120723. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020. PMID: 33371350 Free PMC article.
-
Market approval processes for new types of spinal devices: challenges and recommendations for improvement.Eur Spine J. 2016 Sep;25(9):2993-3003. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4606-1. Epub 2016 May 27. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27235154
-
An increase in height of spinous process is associated with decreased heights of intervertebral disc and vertebral body in the degenerative process of lumbar spine.Eur Spine J. 2013 Sep;22(9):2030-4. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2764-y. Epub 2013 Apr 2. Eur Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23546689 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials