Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Apr 23;330(7497):940.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38413.663137.8F. Epub 2005 Apr 4.

Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study

Affiliations

Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study

John Macleod et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To measure the coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and the prevalence of infection in the general population in the United Kingdom. To investigate factors associated with these measures.

Design: Cross sectional survey of people randomly selected from general practice registers. Invitation to provide a specimen collected at home.

Setting: England.

Participants: 19,773 men and women aged 16-39 years invited to participate in screening.

Main outcome measures: Coverage and uptake of screening; prevalence of chlamydia.

Results: Coverage of chlamydia screening was 73% and was lower in areas with a higher proportion of non-white residents. Uptake in 16-24 year olds was 31.5% and was lower in men, younger adults, and practices in disadvantaged areas. Overall prevalence of chlamydia was 2.8% (95%confidence interval 2.2% to 3.4%) in men and 3.6% (3.1% to 4.9%) in women, but it was higher in people younger than 25 years (men 5.1%; 4.0% to 6.3%; women 6.2%; 5.2% to 7.8%). Prevalence was higher in the subgroup of younger women who were harder to engage in screening. The strongest determinant of chlamydial infection was having one or more new sexual partners in the past year.

Conclusions: Postal chlamydia screening was feasible, but coverage was incomplete and uptake was modest. Lower coverage of postal screening in areas with more non-white residents along with poorer uptake in more deprived areas and among women at higher risk of infection could mean that screening leads to wider inequalities in sexual health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Low N, Egger M. What should we do about screening for genital chlamydia? Int J Epidemiol 2002;31: 891-3. - PubMed
    1. Low N, McCarthy A, Macleod J, Salisbury C, Horner PJ, Roberts TE, et al. The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design. Sex Transm Inf 2004;80: 342-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen B, Olesen F, Møller JK, Østergaard L. Population-based strategies for outreach screening of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: a randomized, controlled trial. J Infect Dis 2002;185: 252-8. - PubMed
    1. Macleod J, Rowsell R, Horner P, Crowley T, Caul EO, Low N, Smith GD. Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening? Br J Gen Pract 1999;49: 455-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Low N, Macleod J, Salisbury C, Egger M, and the ClaSS study group. Bias in chlamydia prevalence surveys. Lancet 2003;362: 1157-8. - PubMed

Publication types