Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study
- PMID: 15809231
- PMCID: PMC556339
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38413.663137.8F
Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study
Abstract
Objective: To measure the coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and the prevalence of infection in the general population in the United Kingdom. To investigate factors associated with these measures.
Design: Cross sectional survey of people randomly selected from general practice registers. Invitation to provide a specimen collected at home.
Setting: England.
Participants: 19,773 men and women aged 16-39 years invited to participate in screening.
Main outcome measures: Coverage and uptake of screening; prevalence of chlamydia.
Results: Coverage of chlamydia screening was 73% and was lower in areas with a higher proportion of non-white residents. Uptake in 16-24 year olds was 31.5% and was lower in men, younger adults, and practices in disadvantaged areas. Overall prevalence of chlamydia was 2.8% (95%confidence interval 2.2% to 3.4%) in men and 3.6% (3.1% to 4.9%) in women, but it was higher in people younger than 25 years (men 5.1%; 4.0% to 6.3%; women 6.2%; 5.2% to 7.8%). Prevalence was higher in the subgroup of younger women who were harder to engage in screening. The strongest determinant of chlamydial infection was having one or more new sexual partners in the past year.
Conclusions: Postal chlamydia screening was feasible, but coverage was incomplete and uptake was modest. Lower coverage of postal screening in areas with more non-white residents along with poorer uptake in more deprived areas and among women at higher risk of infection could mean that screening leads to wider inequalities in sexual health.
Similar articles
-
Opportunistic and systematic screening for chlamydia: a study of consultations by young adults in general practice.Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Feb;56(523):99-103. Br J Gen Pract. 2006. PMID: 16464322 Free PMC article.
-
Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. doi: 10.3310/hta11080. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17311735 Review.
-
Postal urine specimens: are they a feasible method for genital chlamydial infection screening?Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):455-8. Br J Gen Pract. 1999. PMID: 10562745 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.Sex Transm Infect. 2005 Feb;81(1):17-23. doi: 10.1136/sti.2004.010173. Sex Transm Infect. 2005. PMID: 15681716 Free PMC article.
-
Screening and treating Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: interpretation of findings from randomized controlled trials.Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Feb;40(2):97-102. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31827bd637. Sex Transm Dis. 2013. PMID: 23324973 Review.
Cited by
-
Developing a realistic sexual network model of chlamydia transmission in Britain.Theor Biol Med Model. 2006 Jan 20;3:3. doi: 10.1186/1742-4682-3-3. Theor Biol Med Model. 2006. PMID: 16426453 Free PMC article.
-
The Sexunzipped trial: optimizing the design of online randomized controlled trials.J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 11;15(12):e278. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2668. J Med Internet Res. 2013. PMID: 24334216 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Non-participation in population-based disease prevention programs in general practice.BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 9;12:856. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-856. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 23046688 Free PMC article.
-
Home-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes.BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 4;13:189. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-189. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23496833 Free PMC article.
-
Home screening for sexually transmitted diseases in high-risk young women: randomised controlled trial.Sex Transm Infect. 2007 Jul;83(4):286-91. doi: 10.1136/sti.2006.023762. Epub 2007 Feb 14. Sex Transm Infect. 2007. PMID: 17301105 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Low N, Egger M. What should we do about screening for genital chlamydia? Int J Epidemiol 2002;31: 891-3. - PubMed
-
- Andersen B, Olesen F, Møller JK, Østergaard L. Population-based strategies for outreach screening of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: a randomized, controlled trial. J Infect Dis 2002;185: 252-8. - PubMed
-
- Low N, Macleod J, Salisbury C, Egger M, and the ClaSS study group. Bias in chlamydia prevalence surveys. Lancet 2003;362: 1157-8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous