Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular components inserted with metaphyseal cement and stems without cement
- PMID: 15809946
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.08.010
Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular components inserted with metaphyseal cement and stems without cement
Abstract
The clinical and radiographic outcomes of 50 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties in 47 patients, placed with metaphyseal cemented femoral and tibial components with press-fit cementless stems, were reviewed at 36-month average follow-up. Revision was performed for aseptic loosening (11/50), infection (17/50), periprosthetic fracture (8/50), component failure (6/50), instability (6/50), and malalignment (2/50). The press-fit cementless stems were 80 to 160 mm in length and tightly contacted the endosteum of the metadiaphyseal areas. Four (9%) knees were re-revised for infection, zero for aseptic loosening. The average modified Hospital for Special Surgery knee score improved from 49 to 87. One patient (2%) reported thigh pain, and 1 reported leg pain. Metaphyseal cemented revision total knee components with press-fit cementless femoral and tibial stems were not associated with significant thigh and leg pain.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and radiographic results of 184 consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties placed with modular cementless stems.J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.033. Epub 2009 Jun 24. J Arthroplasty. 2009. PMID: 19553076
-
Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.J Arthroplasty. 1997 Dec;12(8):896-903. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90159-5. J Arthroplasty. 1997. PMID: 9458255
-
Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 25;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0485-6. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015. PMID: 25888058 Free PMC article.
-
Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19;94(18):1712-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00539. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012. PMID: 22992881 Review.
-
Minimum 5-Year Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship for a Single Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty System Using Hybrid Fixation and Press-Fit Stems.J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6S):S297-S301. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.083. Epub 2023 Mar 31. J Arthroplasty. 2023. PMID: 37003457 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of extension stem length and diameter on clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 8;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3030-1. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020. PMID: 31914984 Free PMC article.
-
[TKA revision of semiconstraint components using the 3-step technique].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2011 Feb;23(1):61-9. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-0002-x. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2011. PMID: 21344226 German.
-
Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones.Int Orthop. 2012 Sep;36(9):1857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1601-y. Epub 2012 Jun 26. Int Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22733440 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Floating-embedded stems reduce tibial stress shielding in total knee revision arthroplasty.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05465-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 39819483 Free PMC article.
-
Fixation of stem in revision of total knee arthroplasty: cemented versus cementless-a meta-analysis.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3200-3211. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3820-4. Epub 2015 Dec 19. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. PMID: 26685696
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical