Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Apr;113(4):375-82.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.6362.

Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a review of the literature

Radim J Srám et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Apr.

Abstract

Over the last decade or so, a large number of studies have investigated the possible adverse effects of ambient air pollution on birth outcomes. We reviewed these studies, which were identified by a systematic search of the main scientific databases. Virtually all reviewed studies were population based, with information on exposure to air pollution derived from routine monitoring sources. Overall, there is evidence implicating air pollution in adverse effects on different birth outcomes, but the strength of the evidence differs between outcomes. The evidence is sufficient to infer a causal relationship between particulate air pollution and respiratory deaths in the postneonatal period. For air pollution and birth weight the evidence suggests causality, but further studies are needed to confirm an effect and its size and to clarify the most vulnerable period of pregnancy and the role of different pollutants. For preterm births and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) the evidence as yet is insufficient to infer causality, but the available evidence justifies further studies. Molecular epidemiologic studies suggest possible biologic mechanisms for the effect on birth weight, premature birth, and IUGR and support the view that the relation between pollution and these birth outcomes is genuine. For birth defects, the evidence base so far is insufficient to draw conclusions. In terms of exposure to specific pollutants, particulates seem the most important for infant deaths, and the effect on IUGR seems linked to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, but the existing evidence does not allow precise identification of the different pollutants or the timing of exposure that can result in adverse pregnancy outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adriaanse HP, Knottnerus JA, Delgado LR, Cox HH, Essed GGM. Smoking in Dutch women and birth weight. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;28:25–30. - PubMed
    1. Alderman BW, Baron AE, Saviz DA. Maternal exposure to neighborhood carbon monoxide and risk of low infant birth weight. Public Health Rep. 1987;102:410–414. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Axelrod D, Davis DL, Hajek RA, Jones LA. It’s time to rethink dose: the case for combining cancer, and birth and developmental defects [Editorial] Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:A246–A249. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barker DJP. The fetal and infant origins of disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 1995;25:457–463. - PubMed
    1. Binková B, Cerna M, Pastorkova A, Jelinek R, Benes I, Novak J, et al. Biological activities of organic compounds adsorbed onto ambient air particles: comparison between the cities of Teplice and Prague during the summer and winter seasons 2000–2001. Mutat Res. 2003;525:43–59. - PubMed

Publication types