Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Apr;113(4):383-90.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.6987.

Chemical mixtures: considering the evolution of toxicology and chemical assessment

Affiliations

Chemical mixtures: considering the evolution of toxicology and chemical assessment

Emily Monosson. Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Apr.

Abstract

The assessment of chemical mixtures is a complex topic for toxicologists, regulators, and the public. In this article the linkage between the science of toxicology and the needs of governmental regulatory agencies in the United States is explored through an overview of environmental regulations enacted over the past century and a brief history of modern toxicology. One of the goals of this overview is to encourage both regulators and scientists to consider the benefits and limitations of this science-regulatory relationship as they tackle existing issues such as chemical mixtures. It is clear that a) over the past 100 years chemical regulation and toxicologic research, have in large part, shared a common emphasis on characterization and regulation of individual chemicals. But chemical mixtures have been, and continue to be, evaluated at hazardous waste sites around the United States. For this reason the current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for chemical mixtures assessment are also reviewed. These guidelines highlight the current practice of mixtures assessment, which relies primarily on the existing single-chemical database. It is also clear that b) the science and assessment of chemical mixtures are moving forward through the combined efforts of regulatory agencies and scientists from a broad range of disciplines, including toxicology. Because toxicology is at this exciting crossroads, particular attention should be paid to the forces (e.g., public demands, regulatory needs, funding, academic interests) that both promote and limit the growth of this expanding discipline.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ACGIH 1963. Threshold limit values for 1963. In: Transactions of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 6–10 May, Cincinnati, Ohio. Cincinnati, OH:American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 12–16. - PubMed
    1. ACGIH 2004. History. Cincinnati, OH:American Conference Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Available: http://www.acgih.org/About/history.htm [accessed 22 January 2004].
    1. Ankley G, Mihaich E, Stahl R, Tillett D, Colborn T, McMaster S, et al. Overview of a workshop on screening methods for detecting potential (anti-) estrogenic/androgenic chemicals in wildlife. Environ Toxicol Chem. 1998;17:68–87.
    1. ATSDR 2002. Interaction Profiles for Toxic Substances. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Atlanta, GA:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/iphome.html [accessed 23 January 2004].
    1. ATSDR 2004. Guidance Manual for the Assessment of Joint Toxic Action of Chemical Mixtures. Atlanta GA:Available: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/interactionprofiles/ipga.html [accessed 1 March 2005].

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources