Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor proportions
- PMID: 15819823
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00206.x
Assessment of dental appearance following changes in incisor proportions
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the assessment of attractiveness of standardized changes in incisor proportions. Two original photographs, showing the maxillary anterior teeth in the frame of a smile, were computer-manipulated. From the so-produced symmetrical 'golden standard' images, two sets were constructed. Each set contained one golden standard image and seven images with different standardized changes concerning (i) width-to-length ratios of the central incisors (60-96%) and (ii) tooth-to-tooth proportions between the widths of lateral and central incisors (43-87%). The judges, consisting of three groups of individuals (24 dentists, 24 medical students, and 179 patients), ranked each photo set for attractiveness on a visual analogue scale. The width-to-length ratios were assessed as most attractive within a range of 75-85% (medical students, patients) or 75-80% (dentists), respectively. The tooth-to-tooth proportions showed the best results concerning attractive appearance within a range of 50-74% (medical students, patients) or 56-68% (dentists), respectively. No significant differences between the participant groups were found except for some extreme variations. It was concluded that a most attractive 'golden range' could be identified for both the width-to-length ratios and the tooth-to-tooth proportions of the maxillary incisors.
Similar articles
-
A study of dentists' preferred maxillary anterior tooth width proportions: comparing the recurring esthetic dental proportion to other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(6):324-37; discussion 338-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00114.x. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007. PMID: 18005282
-
Assessment of the golden ratio in pleasing smiles.World J Orthod. 2009 Fall;10(3):224-8. World J Orthod. 2009. PMID: 19885425
-
Dentists' preferences of anterior tooth proportion--a web-based study.J Prosthodont. 2000 Sep;9(3):123-36. J Prosthodont. 2000. PMID: 11179463
-
Laypeople's preferences regarding frontal dentofacial esthetics: tooth-related factors.J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Jun;142(6):635-45. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0245. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011. PMID: 21628684 Review.
-
Maxillary Anterior Teeth Dimensions and Relative Width Proportions: A Narrative Literature Review.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Dec 25;12(1):3. doi: 10.3390/dj12010003. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38248211 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of tooth proportions in an aesthetically acceptable smile.J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):ZC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11338.5771. Epub 2015 Apr 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015. PMID: 26023632 Free PMC article.
-
Golden proportion assessment between maxillary and mandibular teeth on Indian population.J Adv Prosthodont. 2012 May;4(2):72-5. doi: 10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.72. Epub 2012 May 30. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012. PMID: 22737310 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid Gel Injection in the Restoration of Fullness of the Upper Lips.J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2017 Apr-Jun;10(2):101-105. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_115_16. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2017. PMID: 28852297 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' and dentists' perception of dental appearance.Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Apr;15(2):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0393-y. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Clin Oral Investig. 2011. PMID: 20232095
-
Investigation of the esthetic perception of different canine parameters.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Dec;26(12):6973-6983. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04651-2. Epub 2022 Jul 29. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 35906341 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources