Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992;24(2):97-102.
doi: 10.1159/000129194.

Effect of nonabsorbable and rapidly absorbable suture material on the cytokinetics of crypt cells in colonic anastomoses in the rat

Affiliations

Effect of nonabsorbable and rapidly absorbable suture material on the cytokinetics of crypt cells in colonic anastomoses in the rat

G Hubens et al. Eur Surg Res. 1992.

Abstract

The effect of non-absorbable and rapidly absorbable suture material on the cytokinetics of crypt cells was studied in right and left colonic anastomoses in the rat by using stathmokinetic methods. Forty-five male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to three groups. In group A (n = 15), colonic anastomoses were performed in the right and left colon using nonabsorbable, stainless steel sutures. Groups B (n = 15) animals had identically located anastomoses but a rapidly absorbable suture material (Vicryl Rapide) was used. Animals of group C (n = 15) acted as controls. Eight weeks postoperatively, the crypt cell production rate (CCPR) was determined after measuring the slope of the metaphase accumulation line. At this time, no suture material was detected in any of group B (Vicryl Rapide) animals, while in group A rats (stainless steel), 79% of the animals had suture material in place. A steel-sutured anastomosis significantly increased the CCPR in the right colon from 6.2 to 10.6 cells/crypt/h and in the left colon from 5.6 to 9.8 cells/crypt/h compared with controls (p less than 0.05). An anastomosis performed with Vicryl Rapide, whether in the proximal or descending colon, did not influence the CCPR when compared with the control group (right 6.4 vs. 6.2 cells/crypt/h; left 4.2 vs. 5.6 cells/crypt/h). The CCPR at steel-sutured anastomoses was significantly higher than the CCPR at the Vicryl Rapide anastomotic site both in the right (10.6 vs. 6.4 cells/crypt/h) as well as in the left colonic sites (9.8 vs. 4.2 cells/crypt/h) (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources