Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 May;29(5):561-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-7913-y.

How to appraise a diagnostic test

Affiliations

How to appraise a diagnostic test

Mohit Bhandari et al. World J Surg. 2005 May.

Abstract

Clinicians frequently confront challenges when using diagnostic tests to help them decide whether the patient before them suffers from a particular target condition or diagnosis. The primary issues to consider when determining the validity of a diagnostic test study are how the authors assembled the patients and whether they used an appropriate reference standard in all patients to determine whether the patients did or did not have the target condition. Surgeons should be interested in the characteristics of the test that indicates the direction and magnitude of change in the probability of the target condition associated with a particular test result. The likelihood ratio best captures the link between the pretest probability of the target condition and the probability after the test results are obtained (also called the posttest probability). Many studies, however, present the properties of diagnostic tests in less clinically useful terms: sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity denotes the proportion of people with the disorder in whom the test result is positive. Specificity denotes the proportion of people without the disorder in whom the test result is negative. Application of the guides presented in this article can allow surgeons to assess critically studies regarding a diagnostic test.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1969 Sep;64(1):161-7 - PubMed
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Jan;150(1):113-6 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1994 Feb 2;271(5):389-91 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Jan;104(1):66-73 - PubMed
    1. J Hand Surg Br. 1998 Jun;23(3):324-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources