Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2005 Mar 14;7(1):e4.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e4.

Electronic health records should support clinical research

Editorial

Electronic health records should support clinical research

John Powell et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

One aspect of electronic care records which has received little attention is the potential benefit to clinical research. Electronic records could facilitate new interfaces between care and research environments, leading to great improvements in the scope and efficiency of research. Benefits range from systematically generating hypotheses for research to undertaking entire studies based only on electronic record data. Researchers and research managers must engage with electronic record initiatives to realize these benefits. Clinicians and patients must have confidence in the consent, confidentiality and security arrangements for the uses of secondary data. Provided that such initiatives establish adequate information governance arrangements, within a clear ethical framework, innovative clinical research should flourish. Major benefits to patient care could ensue given sufficient development of the care-research interface via electronic records.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Comment on

References

    1. Collins T. Final cost of NHS IT programme could rise to more than £18.6bn. Computer Weekly. 2004 Oct 12; http://www.computerweekly.com/Article134143.htm.
    1. Humber Michael. National programme for information technology. BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1145–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1145.328/7449/1145 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gunter Tracy D, Terry Nicolas P. The emergence of national electronic health record architectures in the United States and Australia: models, costs, and questions. J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 14;7(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e3. http://www.jmir.org/2005/1/e3/v7e3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The United Kingdom Parliament, Lords Hansard, authors. Patient Information and Advisory Group. 2004. Jul 6, (col 655)
    1. Adams Trina, Budden Martin, Hoare Chris, Sanderson Hugh. Lessons from the central Hampshire electronic health record pilot project: issues of data protection and consent. BMJ. 2004 Apr 10;328(7444):871–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7444.871. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7444/871.328/7444/871 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources