Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Apr 14;33(7):2210-4.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gki508. Print 2005.

Asymmetry in RNA pseudoknots: observation and theory

Affiliations

Asymmetry in RNA pseudoknots: observation and theory

Daniel P Aalberts et al. Nucleic Acids Res. .

Abstract

RNA can fold into a topological structure called a pseudoknot, composed of non-nested double-stranded stems connected by single-stranded loops. Our examination of the PseudoBase database of pseudoknotted RNA structures reveals asymmetries in the stem and loop lengths and provocative composition differences between the loops. By taking into account differences between major and minor grooves of the RNA double helix, we explain much of the asymmetry with a simple polymer physics model and statistical mechanical theory, with only one adjustable parameter.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) An ABAB-pseudoknot is depicted in planar representation. The structure is composed of two double-helical stems (with s1 and s2 base pairs) and the three single-stranded loops of lengths L1, L2 and L3 nucleotides. (b) The 3D fold of the same knot is depicted. The x, y, z axes point left, out, up. Coaxial stacking interactions between stems 1 and 2 can stabilize the structure, particularly if L2 = 0. Note that loop 1 lies on the major groove side, while loop 3 lies on the minor groove side.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The statistics of ABAB-pseudoknots in PseudoBase (obs) with L2 = 0 is compared with our theory (thy). (a) Stems favor different numbers of base pairs s1 and s2. (b) Loop lengths L1 and L3 are also asymmetric.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The distances DL1 and DL3 across the major or minor groove as a function of the number of bases s in the associated stem. The differences are due to the geometries of major- and minor grooves.

References

    1. Zuker M., Stiegler P. Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981;9:133–148. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3406–3415. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hofacker I.L., Fontana W., Standler P.F., Bonhoeffer L.S., Tacker M., Schuster P. Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures. Monatsh. Chem. 1994;125:167–188.
    1. Lyngsø R.B., Pedersen C.N. RNA pseudoknot prediction in energy-based models. J. Comput. Biol. 2000;7:409–427. - PubMed
    1. Rivas E., Eddy S.R. A dynamic programming algorithm for RNA structure prediction including pseudoknots. J. Mol. Biol. 1999;285:2053–2068. - PubMed

Publication types