Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2005 May;89(5):522-4.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.068163.

Vision restoration therapy

Editorial

Vision restoration therapy

B A Sabel et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 May.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
This graph (adapted from Sabel et al4) displays the visual field border position in the right eye as assessed by the three perimetric tests. (A) The results of patient CH where grey areas represent the area of the defect. A mismatch in perimetric fields was noted even before therapy. After VRT, the HRP and TAP border shifted away from the vertical meridian whereas the SLO border remained roughly in the same position, exaggerating the border mismatch. (B) Shows the absolute visual field border for SLO, TAP, and HRP in the central 10° region in degrees of visual angle from the 0 vertical meridian before and after VRT (mean (SEM)). Whereas the SLO border was almost identical pre-VRT compared with post-VRT, the HRP and TAP borders were not only significantly different before VRT (mismatch), but also both shifted significantly after VRT, producing a visual field enlargement.

Comment in

Comment on

References

    1. Reinhard J, Schreiber A, Schiefer U, et al. Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defect? A fundus controlled study. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:30–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Horton JC. Disappointing results from NovaVision’s visual restoration therapy. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plant GT. A workout for hemianopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sabel BA, Kenkel S, Kasten E. Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed by comparative perimetric analysis and subjective questionnaires. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22:399–420. - PubMed
    1. Julkunen L, Tenovuo O, Jääskeläinen S, et al. Rehabilitation of chronic post-stroke visual field defect with computer-assisted training. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2003;21:19–28. - PubMed