The effect of an interspinous process implant on facet loading during extension
- PMID: 15834334
- DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000158876.51771.f8
The effect of an interspinous process implant on facet loading during extension
Abstract
Study design: Facet loading parameters of lumbar cadaver spines were measured during extension before and after placement of an interspinous process implant.
Objective: The study was undertaken to quantify the influence of an interspinous implant on facet loading at the implanted and adjacent levels during extension.
Summary of background data: Facet loading is increased during extension and decreased during flexion. Previous studies have demonstrated that interspinous process decompression relieves disc pressure at the implanted level and does not alter disc pressure at the adjacent levels. Facet joints are believed to play a key role in back pain, especially in patients with collapsed discs and increased motion segment mobility resulting in increased facet loading.
Methods: Seven cadaver spines (L2-L5) were loaded to 15 Nm of extension and 700 N compression with and without an interspinous process implant (X STOP) placed between the L3-L4 spinous processes. Pressure-sensitive film was placed in the facet joints of the implanted and adjacent levels. After loading, the film was digitally analyzed for peak pressure, average pressure, contact area, and force. These values were compared between the intact and implanted specimens at the adjacent and implanted levels using a paired t test (P < 0.05).
Results: The implant significantly reduced the mean peak pressure, average pressure, contact area, and force at the implanted level. The mean peak pressure, average pressure, contact area, and force at the adjacent levels were not significantly different between the intact and implanted specimens with the exception of contact area at the L2-L3 level.
Conclusions: Interspinous process decompression will unlikely cause adjacent level facet pain or accelerated facet joint degeneration. Furthermore, pain induced from pressure originating in the facets and/or posterior anulus of the lumbar spine may be relieved by interspinous pro-cess decompression. Clinical results from patients with a component of lower back pain suggest that this is a valid conclusion.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical study of dynamic changes in L4-L5 foramen surface area in flexion and extension after implantation of four interspinous process devices.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Apr;101(2):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.11.016. Epub 2015 Feb 23. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015. PMID: 25736197
-
The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 1;30(7):744-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000157483.28505.e3. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 15803075
-
Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Aug;23(2):200-8. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14419. Epub 2015 May 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 25932601
-
Determination of the in vivo posterior loading environment of the Coflex interlaminar-interspinous implant.Spine J. 2010 Mar;10(3):244-51. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.10.010. Epub 2009 Dec 11. Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20004622 Review.
-
Dynamic interspinous process technology.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Aug 15;30(16 Suppl):S73-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000174532.58468.6c. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005. PMID: 16103838 Review.
Cited by
-
Limitations of current in vitro test protocols for investigation of instrumented adjacent segment biomechanics: critical analysis of the literature.Eur Spine J. 2015 Sep;24(9):1882-92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4040-9. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Eur Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26038156 Review.
-
Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous u (coflex).J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009 Oct;46(4):292-9. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.4.292. Epub 2009 Oct 31. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009. PMID: 19893715 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical response of lumbar facet joints under follower preload: a finite element study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Mar 15;17:126. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0980-4. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016. PMID: 26980002 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical evaluation of the X-Stop device for surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Oct;25(7):374-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318227eb84. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012. PMID: 22015626 Free PMC article.
-
[Percutaneous interspinous distraction for the treatment of dynamic lumbar spinal stenosis and low back pain].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010 Nov;22(5-6):495-511. doi: 10.1007/s00064-010-1004-4. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2010. PMID: 21153008 German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials