Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Feb;20(2):155-9.
doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40270.x.

Resident research and scholarly activity in internal medicine residency training programs

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Resident research and scholarly activity in internal medicine residency training programs

Rachel B Levine et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: 1) To describe how internal medicine residency programs fulfill the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) scholarly activity training requirement including the current context of resident scholarly work, and 2) to compare findings between university and nonuniversity programs.

Design: Cross-sectional mailed survey.

Setting: ACGME-accredited internal medicine residency programs.

Participants: Internal medicine residency program directors.

Measurements: Data were collected on 1) interpretation of the scholarly activity requirement, 2) support for resident scholarship, 3) scholarly activities of residents, 4) attitudes toward resident research, and 5) program characteristics. University and nonuniversity programs were compared.

Main results: The response rate was 78%. Most residents completed a topic review with presentation (median, 100%) to fulfill the requirement. Residents at nonuniversity programs were more likely to complete case reports (median, 40% vs 25%; P=.04) and present at local or regional meetings (median, 25% vs 20%; P=.01), and were just as likely to conduct hypothesis-driven research (median, 20% vs 20%; P=.75) and present nationally (median, 10% vs 5%; P=.10) as residents at university programs. Nonuniversity programs were more likely to report lack of faculty mentors (61% vs 31%; P<.001) and resident interest (55% vs 40%; P=.01) as major barriers to resident scholarship. Programs support resident scholarship through research curricula (47%), funding (46%), and protected time (32%).

Conclusions: Internal medicine residents complete a variety of projects to fulfill the scholarly activity requirement. Nonuniversity programs are doing as much as university programs in meeting the requirement and supporting resident scholarship despite reporting significant barriers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Median response and interquartile range, percent of internal medicine residents involved in various scholarly activities during the years 1998 through 2001. *P <.05, Wilcoxon ranksum test for comparison of university versus nonuniversity programs.

References

    1. Whitcomb ME. It's time to focus on the quality of GME. Acad Med. 2003;78:1–2. - PubMed
    1. Steinbrook R. The debate over residents' work hours. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1296–302. - PubMed
    1. Philibert I, Friedmann P, Williams WT. New requirements for resident duty hours. JAMA. 2002;288:1112–4. - PubMed
    1. Morelock JA, Stern DT. Shifting patients: how residency programs respond to residency review committee requirements. Am J Med. 2003;115:163–9. - PubMed
    1. AAMC policy guidance on graduate medical education: assuring quality patient care and quality education. Acad Med. 2003;78:112–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms