Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jan;17(1):84-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1295-4. Epub 2005 Apr 19.

Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review

Affiliations
Review

Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review

Christopher Maher et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Jan.

Abstract

The aim of this review is to summarize the available literature on gynecological management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse. A MEDLINE search and a hand search of conference proceedings of the International Continence Society and International Urogynecological Association was performed. Two randomized trials demonstrated that the transvaginal approach to rectocele is superior to the transanal repair in terms of recurrent prolapse. The traditional posterior colporrhaphy with levator ani plication was largely superceded by fascial repairs with similar anatomic success rates but favorable functional outcome. The midline fascial plication may offer a superior anatomic and functional outcome compared to the discrete site-specific fascial repair. Controlled studies are necessary to evaluate whether a sacrocolpopexy combined with posterior mesh interposition is an effective alternative to the transvaginal repair. There is currently no evidence to recommend the routine use of any graft and complications such as mesh erosion, infection, and rejection have to be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Dec;177(6):1345-53; discussion 1353-5 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 Aug;33(8):684-7 - PubMed
    1. J Chir (Paris). 1991 Nov;128(11):465-9 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2001 Aug 11;323(7308):334-6 - PubMed
    1. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997 May;4(3):381-4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources