Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 May;2(5):474-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.01.017.

Long-term results after ablation of infarct-related ventricular tachycardia

Affiliations

Long-term results after ablation of infarct-related ventricular tachycardia

Oliver R Segal et al. Heart Rhythm. 2005 May.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term effects of ablation of infarct-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) and the subsequent requirement for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy.

Background: The long-term consequences after initially successful catheter ablation of infarct-related VT remain unclear.

Methods: Forty patients who presented with infarct-related VT were studied using noncontact mapping to guide ablation.

Results: One hundred forty VTs were mapped using the noncontact mapping system, including 36 (25.7%) clinical VTs. An endocardial exit site was determined in 100% of VT circuits, diastolic endocardial activity in 77 VTs (55%), and complete circuits in 24 VTs (17.1%). Eighty-one VTs (57.9%) were targeted for ablation, of which 67 (82.7% of targeted) were successfully ablated, including 27 clinical VTs (75% of clinical). Documented recurrence of an ablated VT occurred in 7.5% of patients over 36.3 +/- 21.0 months of follow-up. Episodes of new or recurrent, nontargeted VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred in 37.5% and VT recurrence without documentation of cycle length in 5%. In patients with ICDs, mean shock frequency was reduced from 6.8 +/- 7.3 per month in the year prior to ablation to 0.05 +/- 0.12 per month after ablation, over 24.7 +/- 18.9 months of follow-up (P < .0001).

Conclusions: In patients with infarct-related VT, noncontact mapping-guided VT ablation is associated with a high procedural success rate, and VT recurrence necessitating ICD therapy delivery is significantly reduced. However, only 42.5% of patients remain free from VT/VF 3 years after ablation. Catheter ablation for infarct-related VT is indicated as an adjunctive therapy in patients with symptomatic VT but cannot substitute for ICDs and antiarrhythmic drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources