Endocervical curettage at the time of colposcopic assessment of the uterine cervix
- PMID: 15841025
- DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000160774.92271.48
Endocervical curettage at the time of colposcopic assessment of the uterine cervix
Abstract
Colposcopic examination of the uterine cervix remains the gold standard in the evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology. Endocervical curettage (ECC) still forms a limited part of the overall assessment of women with abnormal cervical smears (Pap test) in the United States and in certain other parts of the world. To date, there are no properly randomized trials on the place of ECC in the overall care of women with abnormal Pap test. This review critically appraises the available evidence to look at the possible role of ECC in the complete evaluation of abnormal cervical smears.
Target audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.
Learning objectives: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to list the proposed indications for endocervical curettage (ECC), to summarize the data in support of the routine use of ECC at the time of colposcopy, and to outline the evidence against the use of routine ECC at colposcopy.
Similar articles
-
Endocervical curettage in evaluating abnormal cervical cytology.J Reprod Med. 2000 Apr;45(4):285-92. J Reprod Med. 2000. PMID: 10804483
-
The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.J Reprod Med. 1985 May;30(5):373-5. J Reprod Med. 1985. PMID: 4009557
-
Endocervical curettage as a routine part of colposcopic examinations for abnormal cervical cytology.J Reprod Med. 1985 Nov;30(11):871-3. J Reprod Med. 1985. PMID: 4078822
-
To ECC or not to ECC: the question remains.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Dec;35(4):583-97; viii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.09.007. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008. PMID: 19061818 Review.
-
Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Dec;43(1):2162866. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2162866. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023. PMID: 36689210 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopy and vaginoscopy: A case report.World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jul 26;9(21):5943-5947. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i21.5943. World J Clin Cases. 2021. PMID: 34368312 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a predictive model for endocervical curettage in patients referred for colposcopy: A multicenter retrospective diagnostic study in China.Chin J Cancer Res. 2022 Aug 30;34(4):395-405. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.04.07. Chin J Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 36199535 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of cervical cancer and its precursors by endocervical curettage in 13,115 colposcopically guided biopsy examinations.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):481.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.048. Epub 2010 Aug 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20800216 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials