Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 Oct;64(10):1480-4.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.030437. Epub 2005 Apr 20.

Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant

T K Kvien  1 , P Mowinckel, T Heiberg, K L Dammann, Ø Dale, G J Aanerud, T N Alme, T Uhlig
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant

T K Kvien et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Increasing use of self reported health status in clinical practice and research, as well as patient appreciation of monitoring fluctuations of health over time, suggest a need for more frequent collection of data. Electronic use of health status measures in the follow up of patients is a possible way to achieve this.

Objective: To compare self reported health status measures in a personal digital assistant (PDA) version and a paper/pencil version for test-retest reliability, agreement between scores, and feasibility.

Methods: 30 patients with stable rheumatoid arthritis (mean age 61.6 years, range 49.8 to 70.0; mean disease duration, 16.7 years; 63% female; 67% rheumatoid factor positive; 46.6% on disease modifying antirheumatic drugs) completed self reported health status measures (pain, fatigue, and global health on visual analogue scales (VAS), rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index, modified health assessment questionnaire, SF-36) in a conventional paper based questionnaire version and on a PDA (HP iPAQ, model h5450). Completion was repeated after five to seven days.

Results: Test-retest reliability was similar, as evaluated by the Bland-Altman approach, the coefficient of variation, and intraclass correlation coefficients. The scores showed acceptable agreement, but with a slight tendency to higher scores on VAS with the PDA than the paper/pencil version. No significant differences were seen for measures of feasibility (time to complete, satisfaction score), but 65.5% preferred PDA, 20.7% preferred paper, and 13.8% had no preference.

Conclusions: The clinimetric performance of paper/pencil versions of self reported health status measures was similar to an electronic version, using an inexpensive PDA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Agreement between scores obtained by the PDA and paper versions illustrated by Bland–Altman plots for rheumatoid arthritis disease activity index (RADAI) (panel A) and pain visual analogue score (VAS) (panel B) at T1.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1181-4 - PubMed
    1. Control Clin Trials. 2003 Apr;24(2):182-99 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1983 Nov;26(11):1346-53 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Jun;36(6):729-40 - PubMed

Publication types