Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 May;25(1):92-104.
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20124.

Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: universal structures plus writing system variation

Affiliations

Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: universal structures plus writing system variation

Donald J Bolger et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 May.

Abstract

Recognizing printed words requires the mapping of graphic forms, which vary with writing systems, to linguistic forms, which vary with languages. Using a newly developed meta-analytic approach, aggregated Gaussian-estimated sources (AGES; Chein et al. [2002]: Psychol Behav 77:635-639), we examined the neuroimaging results for word reading within and across writing systems and languages. To find commonalities, we compiled 25 studies in English and other Western European languages that use an alphabetic writing system, 9 studies of native Chinese reading, 5 studies of Japanese Kana (syllabic) reading, and 4 studies of Kanji (morpho-syllabic) reading. Using the AGES approach, we created meta-images within each writing system, isolated reliable foci of activation, and compared findings across writing systems and languages. The results suggest that these writing systems utilize a common network of regions in word processing. Writing systems engage largely the same systems in terms of gross cortical regions, but localization within those regions suggests differences across writing systems. In particular, the region known as the visual word form area (VWFA) shows strikingly consistent localization across tasks and across writing systems. This region in the left mid-fusiform gyrus is critical to word recognition across writing systems and languages.

Recognizing printed words requires the mapping of graphic forms, which vary with writing systems, to linguistic forms, which vary with languages. Using a newly developed meta‐analytic approach, aggregated Gaussian‐estimated sources (AGES; Chein et al. [2002]: Psychol Behav 77:635–639), we examined the neuroimaging results for word reading within and across writing systems and languages. To find commonalities, we compiled 25 studies in English and other Western European languages that use an alphabetic writing system, 9 studies of native Chinese reading, 5 studies of Japanese Kana (syllabic) reading, and 4 studies of Kanji (morpho‐syllabic) reading. Using the AGES approach, we created meta‐images within each writing system, isolated reliable foci of activation, and compared findings across writing systems and languages. The results suggest that these writing systems utilize a common network of regions in word processing. Writing systems engage largely the same systems in terms of gross cortical regions, but localization within those regions suggests differences across writing systems. In particular, the region known as the visual word form area (VWFA) shows strikingly consistent localization across tasks and across writing systems. This region in the left mid‐fusiform gyrus is critical to word recognition across writing systems and languages. Hum Brain Mapp 25:92–104, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
AGES meta‐image of word reading in English/Western European languages. The results are shown in the sagittal view (x = −43), coronal view (y = −54), and axial plane (z = −12). The views correspond to the crosshairs that mark the coordinates predicted by Cohen et al. [2002] as the word‐form area (x, y, z = −43, −54, −12). The meta‐image is derived from 35 studies in which individual word reading is compared to a stable resting baseline condition. The top row images are results of the meta‐analysis with a threshold level equal to an α level of 0.05; the bottom row images reflect an increase in the α level to 0.01. Red lines indicate right hemisphere regions of inferior occipital and fusiform gyrus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta‐images of English/Western alphabetic (first column, green), Chinese character (middle column, yellow), and Japanese (third column) Kana (blue) and Kanji (red) systems. Row 1 displays the results in the sagittal view (x = −45) revealing four critical regions: (1) the occipitotemporal boundary region (not circled); (2) superior posterior temporal and inferior parietal region (red circles); (3), ventral inferior frontal region (yellow circles); and (4) the dorsal inferior frontal area (blue circles) discussed in Tan et al. [this volume]. Row 2 displays this dorsal lateral frontal region in the axial plane (z = 30) suggesting an anterior–posterior dispersion of foci across languages. The crosshairs localize the region identified by Siok et al. [2004] and Tan et al. [this volume]. Row 3 displays results in the axial plane (z = −11) of the occipitotemporal region with the crosshairs again indicating the putative VWFA [Cohen et al.,2000,2002]. Red lines indicate right hemisphere regions of inferior occipital and fusiform/lingual gyrus in Chinese.

References

    1. Binder JR, Liebenthal E, Possing ET, Medler DA, Ward BD (2004). Neural correlates of sensory and decision processes in auditory object identification. Nat Neurosci 7: 295–301. - PubMed
    1. Binder JR, McKiernan KA, Parsons ME, Westbury CF, Possing ET, Kaufman JN, Buchanan L (2003): Neural correlates of lexical access during visual word recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 15: 372–393. - PubMed
    1. Bookheimer SY, Zeffiro T, Blaxton T, Gaillard W, Theodore W (1995): Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading. Hum Brain Mapp 3: 93–106.
    1. Booth JR, Burman DD, Meyer JR, Gitelman DR, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM (2003): Relation between brain activation and lexical performance. Hum Brain Mapp 19: 155–169. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cabeza R, Dolcos F, Prince SE, Rice HJ, Weissman DH, Nyberg N (2003): Attention‐related activity during episodic memory retrieval: a cross‐function fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 41: 390–399. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources