Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2005 Apr 22:6:19.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-19.

The effectiveness of extra corporeal shock wave therapy for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Colin E Thomson  1 , Fay Crawford, Gordon D Murray
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The effectiveness of extra corporeal shock wave therapy for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Colin E Thomson et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: There is considerable controversy regarding the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the management of plantar heel pain. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of randomised controlled trials to investigate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and to produce a precise estimate of the likely benefits of this therapy.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified from the Cochrane Controlled trials register, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from 1966 until September 2004. We included randomised trials which evaluated extracorporeal shock wave therapy used to treat plantar heel pain. Trials comparing extra corporeal shock wave therapy with placebo or different doses of extra corporeal shock wave therapy were considered for inclusion in the review. We independently applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria to each identified randomised controlled trial, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of each trial.

Results: Six RCTs (n = 897) permitted a pooled estimate of effectiveness based on pain scores collected using 10 cm visual analogue scales for morning pain. The estimated weighted mean difference was 0.42 (95% confidence interval 0.02 to 0.83) representing less than 0.5 cm on a visual analogue scale. There was no evidence of heterogeneity and a fixed effects model was used.

Conclusion: A meta-analysis of data from six randomised-controlled trials that included a total of 897 patients was statistically significant in favour of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of plantar heel pain but the effect size was very small. A sensitivity analysis including only high quality trials did not detect a statistically significant effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Progress through the stages of the meta-analysis [29].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pooled estimates of 10 cm VAS scores for morning pain at 12 weeks
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Crawford F, Thomson CE. Interventions for treating plantar heel pain. Vol. 1. Wiley JW; 2005. - PubMed
    1. Gerdesmeyer L, Wagenpfeil S, Haake M, Maier M, Loew M, Wörtler K, Lampe R, Seil R, Handle G, Gassel S, Rompe JD. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic calcifying tendonitis of the rotator cuff – a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical association. 2003;290:2573–2580. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.19.2573. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Speed CA, Nichols D, Humphreys H, Wies JT, Burnet S. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis – a double blind randomised controlled trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2002;20:895–898. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00013-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buchbinder R, Green S, White M, Barnsley L, Smidt N. Shockwave therapy for lateral elbow pain. Vol. 3. Oxford. Update Software.; 2003.
    1. Haake M, Konig IR, Decker T, Riedel C. No effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of tennis elbow-results from a prospective randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2004;84A:1982–1991. - PubMed