Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy yields kidneys with structure and function equivalent to those retrieved by open surgery
- PMID: 15848478
- DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.292
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy yields kidneys with structure and function equivalent to those retrieved by open surgery
Abstract
The technical challenges of laparosopcic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy (LapDN) have raised concerns over the quality of the procured allografts. This study reports the anatomical and functional outcomes of kidneys retrieved from 60 live donors entered into a randomized controlled trial of open versus laparoscopic procurement. Open and laparoscopic donors were well matched for age (P = .18) and body mass index (P = .49). Operating time (P = .0001) and first warm ischaemic time (P < .001) were longer for the laparoscopic donors but total warm time was not different (P = .52). Left renal vein length (P = .14) and left renal artery length (P = .38) were similar. No differences in right vessel length were observed. Rates of acute rejection did not differ, and recipient renal function was similar in the two groups. This study demonstrates that LapDN yields kidneys that are structurally and functionally equivalent to those acquired by the open operation. This data may go some way towards allaying concerns over the effect of laparoscopic procurement on live donor kidneys.
Similar articles
-
Do multiple renal arteries restrict laparoscopic donor nephrectomy?Transplant Proc. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):105-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.11.064. Transplant Proc. 2004. PMID: 15013314
-
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy.Urology. 2005 May;65(5):862-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.051. Urology. 2005. PMID: 15882712
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Feb;21(2):472-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi150. Epub 2005 Oct 4. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006. PMID: 16204289
-
Open versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a focus on the safety of donors and the need for a donor registry.J Urol. 2007 Nov;178(5):1860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Sep 17. J Urol. 2007. PMID: 17868736 Review.
-
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: why not?Arch Esp Urol. 2002 Jul-Aug;55(6):714-20. Arch Esp Urol. 2002. PMID: 12224169 Review.
Cited by
-
From Lumbotomy to Robotic surgery: Narrative review of comparative studies of Surgical techniques in living donor nephrectomy.Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04611-1. Online ahead of print. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. PMID: 40531351 Review.
-
Laparoscopic en bloc kidney transplantation.Indian J Urol. 2012 Jul;28(3):362-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.102731. Indian J Urol. 2012. PMID: 23204675 Free PMC article.
-
The mini-incision donor nephrectomy is best suited for Indian patients undergoing live donor nephrectomy: against the motion.Indian J Urol. 2010 Jan-Mar;26(1):142-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.60465. Indian J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20535306 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5(5):CD006124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006124.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38721875 Free PMC article.
-
Transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Current status.Indian J Urol. 2007 Jul;23(3):294-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.33727. Indian J Urol. 2007. PMID: 19718333 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical