Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 May;241(5):715-22, discussion 722-4.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000160703.75808.7d.

Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Effect of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases

Timothy M Pawlik et al. Ann Surg. 2005 May.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of surgical margin status on survival and site of recurrence in patients treated with hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.

Methods: Using a multicenter database, 557 patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal metastases were identified. Demographics, operative data, pathologic margin status, site of recurrence (margin, other intrahepatic site, extrahepatic), and long-term survival data were collected and analyzed.

Results: On final pathologic analysis, margin status was positive in 45 patients, and negative by 1 to 4 mm in 129, 5 to 9 mm in 85, and > or =1 cm in 298. At a median follow-up of 29 months, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 97%, 74%, and 58%; median survival was 74 months. Tumor size > or =5 cm, >3 tumor nodules, and carcinoembryonic antigen level >200 ng/mL predicted poor survival (all P < 0.05). Median survival was 49 months in patients with positive margins and not yet reached in patients with negative margins (P = 0.01). After hepatic resection, 225 (40.4%) patients had recurrence: 21 at the surgical margin, 56 at another intrahepatic site, 82 at an extrahepatic site, and 66 at both intrahepatic and extrahepatic sites. Patients with negative margins of 1 to 4 mm, 5 to 9 mm, and > or =1 cm had similar overall recurrence rates (P > 0.05). Patients with positive margins were more likely to have surgical margin recurrence (P = 0.003). Adverse preoperative biologic factors including tumor number greater than 3 (P = 0.01) and a preoperative CEA level greater than 200 ng/mL (P = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of positive surgical margin.

Conclusions: A positive margin after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases is associated with adverse biologic factors and increased risk of surgical-margin recurrence. The width of a negative surgical margin does not affect survival, recurrence risk, or site of recurrence. A predicted margin of <1 cm after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases should not be used as an exclusion criterion for resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Imaging patterns of marginal recurrences in 2 patients. A, Contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained 11 months after right hepatectomy shows perfusion changes along surgical margin but no tumor recurrence. B, Contrast-enhanced CT obtained 3 months after A shows hypoattenuating tumor nodule (arrow) abutting the surgical margin. C, Contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained 17 months after right hepatectomy in another patient shows surgical clips and no recurrence. D, Contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained 5 months after C shows recurrent tumor infiltrating the surgical margin and adjacent perihepatic tissues (arrows).
None
FIGURE 2. Distribution by size of the surgical resection margin (n = 557).
None
FIGURE 3. At a median follow-up of 29 months, the overall median survival for patients after resection of CRM was 74.3 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 97%, 74%, and 58%, respectively.
None
FIGURE 4. Survival stratified by margin status. Median survival was 49.6 months in patients with positive margins and not yet reached in patients with negative margins (P = 0.005). No significant difference in survival was seen in patients with a negative surgical margin, regardless of the width of the margin (all P > 0.5).

Comment in

References

    1. Scheele J, Stang R, Altendorf-Hofmann A, et al. Resection of colorectal liver metastases. World J Surg. 1995;19:59–71. - PubMed
    1. Adson MA, van Heerden JA, Adson MH, et al. Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Arch Surg. 1984;119:647–651. - PubMed
    1. Hughes KS, Rosenstein RB, Songhorabodi S, et al. Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases: a multi-institutional study of long-term survivors. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:1–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adam R, Avisar E, Ariche A, et al. Five-year survival following hepatic resection after neoadjuvant therapy for nonresectable colorectal. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:347–353. - PubMed
    1. Choti MA, Sitzmann JV, Tiburi MF, et al. Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg. 2002;235:759–766. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types