Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer
- PMID: 15849813
- PMCID: PMC4305745
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i17.2570
Colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis after ultralow anterior resection with upper sphincter excision for low-lying rectal cancer
Abstract
Aim: There is some evidence of functional superiority of colonic J-pouch over straight coloanal anastomosis (CAA) in ultralow anterior resection (ULAR) or intersphincteric resection. On the assumption that colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis is superior to straight CAA in ULAR with upper sphincter excision (USE: excision of the upper part of the internal sphincter) for low-lying rectal cancer, we compare functional outcome of colonic J-pouch vs the straight CAA.
Methods: Fifty patients of one hundred and thirty-three rectal cancer patients in whom lower margin of the tumors were located between 3 and 5 cm from the anal verge received ULAR including USE from September 1998 to January 2002. Patients were randomized for reconstruction using either a straight (n = 26) or a colonic J-pouch anastomosis (n = 24) with a temporary diverting-loop ileostomy. All patients were followed-up prospectively by a standardized questionnaire (Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) scores and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) scales).
Results: We found that, compared to straight anastomosis patients, the frequency of defecation was significantly lower in J-pouch anastomosis patients for 10 mo after ileostomy takedown. The FISI scores and FIQL scales were significantly better in J-pouch patients than in straight patients at both 3 and 12 mo after ileostomy takedown. Furthermore, we found that FISI scores highly correlated with FIQL scales.
Conclusion: This study indicates that colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis decreases the severity of fecal incontinence and improves the quality of life for 10 mo after ileostomy takedown in patients undergoing ULAR with USE for low-lying rectal cancer.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Neorectal reservoir is not the functional principle of the colonic J-pouch: the volume of a short colonic J-pouch does not differ from a straight coloanal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 May;45(5):660-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6264-3. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002. PMID: 12004217 Clinical Trial.
-
[Colonic pouch and other procedures to improve the continence after low anterior rectal resection with TME].Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Apr;133(2):107-15. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1004735. Zentralbl Chir. 2008. PMID: 18415896 Review. German.
-
Morbidity Following Coloanal Anastomosis: A Comparison of Colonic J-Pouch vs Straight Anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Feb;61(2):156-161. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000960. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018. PMID: 29337769
-
[Comparison of colonic J-pouch and straight coloanal anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis of 8 randomized trails].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Dec;40(12):905-8. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2002. PMID: 12654206 Chinese.
-
Techniques for restoring bowel continuity and function after rectal cancer surgery.World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct 21;12(39):6252-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i39.6252. World J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 17072945 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Anal sphincter asymmetry in anal incontinence after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer.World J Surg. 2008 Sep;32(9):2083-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9602-0. World J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18443852
-
Sphincter preservation for distal rectal cancer--a goal worth achieving at all costs?World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb 21;17(7):855-61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.855. World J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21412495 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of fecal incontinence on quality of life.World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul 14;15(26):3276-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3276. World J Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19598304 Free PMC article.
-
Functional outcomes and quality of life after intersphincteric resection with transverse coloplasty pouch anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study.Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jun 9;29(1):130. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03174-8. Tech Coloproctol. 2025. PMID: 40488963 Free PMC article.
-
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations.Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Apr;17(2):151-62. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0909-3. Epub 2012 Oct 18. Tech Coloproctol. 2013. PMID: 23076289 Review.
References
-
- Braun J, Treutner KH, Winkeltau G, Heidenreich U, Lerch MM, Schumpelick V. Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg. 1992;163:407–412. - PubMed
-
- Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, Bonnel C, Caudry M, Saric J, Parneix M. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1168–1175. - PubMed
-
- Willis S, Kasperk R, Braun J, Schumpelick V. Comparison of colonic J-pouch reconstruction and straight coloanal anastomosis after intersphincteric rectal resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;386:193–199. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources