Minimally invasive left ventricular epicardial lead placement: surgical techniques for heart failure resynchronization therapy
- PMID: 15854930
- DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.10.041
Minimally invasive left ventricular epicardial lead placement: surgical techniques for heart failure resynchronization therapy
Abstract
Background: Epicardial lead placement for biventricular pacing is often a rescue procedure after failed coronary sinus cannulation. This study aims to determine perioperative and early postoperative outcome of minimally invasive left ventricular lead placement as a management strategy for heart failure, comparing minithoracotomy and endoscopic approaches.
Methods: From October 2002 through October 2003, 41 patients underwent minimally invasive left ventricular lead placement, 23 (56%) by minithoracotomy and 18 (44%) endoscopically. Thirty-one (76%) were males, 19 (46%) had previous cardiac surgery, 21 (51%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 17 (41%) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and 28 (65%) had implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
Results: There were no in-hospital deaths, intraoperative complications, or failures to implant the left ventricular lead. Median operative time was longer for the endoscopic approach (188 minutes) than for minithoracotomy (151 minutes; p = 0.006). Preoperatively, the endoscopic group had more mitral regurgitation (median, 2.5 versus 1.0, respectively; p = 0.009). QRS duration was shorter postoperatively (mean change from preoperative, -32 +/- 24 ms; p < 0.0001); this change was unrelated to surgical approach. Impedance also was less postoperatively (mean change, -490 +/- 300 ohms; p < 0.0001), and the change was unrelated to surgical approach. Changes were greater the larger their preoperative values (p < 0.0001). Threshold increased with follow-up time (adjusted p < 0.0001), but impedance decreased (adjusted p = 0.0009); these trends were similar for both approaches. No changes were evident in left ventricular dimensions.
Conclusions: Minimally invasive left ventricular epicardial lead placement is safe and effective, offering selection of the best pacing site with minimal morbidity; it can be considered a primary option for resynchronization therapy.
Similar articles
-
Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead versus coronary sinus lead placement in biventricular pacing.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Feb;27(2):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.09.029. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005. PMID: 15691676
-
Robotically assisted left ventricular epicardial lead implantation for biventricular pacing.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Apr 16;41(8):1414-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00252-3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003. PMID: 12706941
-
Robotic-assisted or minithoracotomy incision for left ventricular lead placement: a single-surgeon, single-center experience.Innovations (Phila). 2012 May-Jun;7(3):208-12. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e31826153b3. Innovations (Phila). 2012. PMID: 22885464
-
Chronic left ventricular failure: the role of imaging in diagnosis and planning of conventional and novel therapies.Clin Radiol. 2009 Mar;64(3):238-49. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 17. Clin Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19185653 Review.
-
Anesthetic Considerations for a Novel Method of Surgical Ventricular Remodeling Using the BioVentrix Revivent TC System.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jul;35(7):2194-2200. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 6. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021. PMID: 33642169 Review.
Cited by
-
High-density epicardial activation mapping to optimize the site for video-thoracoscopic left ventricular lead implant.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;25(8):882-888. doi: 10.1111/jce.12430. Epub 2014 May 12. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 24724625 Free PMC article.
-
Implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillation system using a robotic approach.HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2015 Jul 13;1(5):356-359. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2015.06.008. eCollection 2015 Sep. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2015. PMID: 28491583 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Observational Study of Trans-Septal Endocardial Left Ventricle Lead Implant for Effective Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Challenging Coronary Sinus Anatomy.Biomedicines. 2024 Nov 26;12(12):2693. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122693. Biomedicines. 2024. PMID: 39767600 Free PMC article.
-
Surgically placed left ventricular leads provide similar outcomes to percutaneous leads in patients with failed coronary sinus lead placement.Heart Rhythm. 2010 May;7(5):619-25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Jan 20. Heart Rhythm. 2010. PMID: 20156615 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes in robotic cardiac surgery.J Robot Surg. 2007;1(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/s11701-006-0004-8. Epub 2007 Jan 16. J Robot Surg. 2007. PMID: 25484934 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical