Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
- PMID: 15855432
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.16.1986
Accuracy of revised Bethesda guidelines, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry for the identification of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
Abstract
Context: The selection of individuals for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) genetic testing is challenging. Recently, the National Cancer Institute outlined a new set of recommendations, the revised Bethesda guidelines, for the identification of individuals with HNPCC who should be tested for microsatellite instability.
Objective: To establish the most effective and efficient strategy for the detection of MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers.
Design, setting, and patients: A prospective, multicenter, nationwide study (the EPICOLON study) in 20 hospitals in the general community in Spain of 1222 patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer between November 1, 2000, and October 31, 2001.
Interventions: Microsatellite instability testing and MSH2/MLH1 immunostaining in all patients regardless of age, personal or family history, and tumor characteristics. Patients whose tumors exhibited microsatellite instability and/or lack of protein expression underwent MSH2/MLH1 germline testing.
Main outcome measures: Effectiveness and efficiency of both microsatellite instability testing and immunostaining, either directly or previous selection of patients according to the revised Bethesda guidelines, were evaluated with respect to the presence of MSH2/MLH1 germline mutations.
Results: Two hundred eighty-seven patients (23.5%) fulfilled the revised Bethesda guidelines. Ninety-one patients (7.4%) had a mismatch repair deficiency, with tumors exhibiting either microsatellite instability (n = 83) or loss of protein expression (n = 81). Germline testing identified 11 mutations (0.9%) in either MSH2 (7 cases) or MLH1 (4 cases) genes. Strategies based on either microsatellite instability testing or immunostaining previous selection of patients according to the revised Bethesda guidelines were the most effective (sensitivity, 81.8% and 81.8%; specificity, 98.0% and 98.2%; positive predictive value, 27.3% and 29.0%, respectively) to identify MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the revised Bethesda guidelines as the most discriminating set of clinical parameters (odds ratio, 33.3; 95% confidence interval, 4.3-250; P = .001).
Conclusion: The revised Bethesda guidelines constitute a useful approach to identify patients at risk for HNPCC. In patients fulfilling these criteria, both microsatellite instability testing and immunostaining are equivalent and highly effective strategies to further select those patients who should be tested for MSH2/MLH1 germline mutations.
Comment in
-
Progress in genetic testing, classification, and identification of Lynch syndrome.JAMA. 2005 Apr 27;293(16):2028-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.16.2028. JAMA. 2005. PMID: 15855438 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Bethesda guidelines: relation to microsatellite instability and MLH1 promoter methylation in patients with colorectal cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2001 Oct 16;135(8 Pt 1):566-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_part_1-200110160-00007. Ann Intern Med. 2001. PMID: 11601928
-
Clinical performance of original and revised Bethesda guidelines for the identification of MSH2/MLH1 gene carriers in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: proposal of a new and simpler set of recommendations.Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 May;101(5):1104-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00522.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16696788
-
[The first molecular analysis of a Hungarian HNPCC family: a novel MSH2 germline mutation].Orv Hetil. 2005 May 15;146(20):1009-16. Orv Hetil. 2005. PMID: 15945244 Hungarian.
-
Mutations predisposing to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.Adv Cancer Res. 1997;71:93-119. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60097-4. Adv Cancer Res. 1997. PMID: 9111864 Review.
-
Carcinogenesis in the GI tract: from morphology to genetics and back again.Mod Pathol. 2001 Mar;14(3):236-45. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880292. Mod Pathol. 2001. PMID: 11266532 Review.
Cited by
-
Lynch syndrome diagnostics: decision-making process for germ-line testing.Clin Transl Oncol. 2012 Apr;14(4):254-62. doi: 10.1007/s12094-012-0793-3. Clin Transl Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22484632 Review.
-
Era of universal testing of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013 Feb 15;5(2):12-9. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i2.12. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23556052 Free PMC article.
-
Biomarkers (mRNAs and Non-Coding RNAs) for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer - From the Body Fluid to Tissue Level.Front Oncol. 2021 Apr 29;11:632834. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.632834. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33996548 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Circulating Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer (CRC)-Their Utility in Diagnosis and Prognosis.J Clin Med. 2021 May 28;10(11):2391. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112391. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34071492 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Different Selection Approaches for Identifying Lynch Syndrome-Related Colorectal Cancer Patients: Unity Is Strength.Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 9;12:827822. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.827822. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35223509 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical