Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Apr;93(2):237-42.

Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract

Takeo Nakayama  1 , Nobuko Hirai, Shigeaki Yamazaki, Mariko Naito
Affiliations

Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract

Takeo Nakayama et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The use of a structured abstract has been recommended in reporting medical literature to quickly convey necessary information to editors and readers. The use of structured abstracts increased during the mid-1990s; however, recent practice has yet to be analyzed.

Objectives: This article explored actual reporting patterns of abstracts recently published in selected medical journals and examined what these journals required of abstracts (structured or otherwise and, if structured, which format).

Methods: The top thirty journals according to impact factors noted in the "Medicine, General and Internal" category of the ISI Journal Citation Reports (2000) were sampled. Articles of original contributions published by each journal in January 2001 were examined. Cluster analysis was performed to classify the patterns of structured abstracts objectively. Journals' instructions to authors for writing an article abstract were also examined.

Results: Among 304 original articles that included abstracts, 188 (61.8%) had structured and 116 (38.2%) had unstructured abstracts. One hundred twenty-five (66.5%) of the abstracts used the introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) format, and 63 (33.5%) used the 8-heading format proposed by Haynes et al. Twenty-one journals requested structured abstracts in their instructions to authors; 8 journals requested the 8-heading format; and 1 journal requested it only for intervention studies.

Conclusions: Even in recent years, not all abstracts of original articles are structured. The eight-heading format was neither commonly used in actual reporting patterns nor noted in journal instructions to authors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Integration of similar headings of the 188 structured abstracts of the original articles
Figure 2
Figure 2
The relationship between the introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) format and the eight-heading format of the structured abstracts
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr; 106(4):598–604. - PubMed
    1. Huth EJ. Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr; 106(4):626–7. - PubMed
    1. Altmam DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Nov; 107(5):790–1. - PubMed
    1. Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, and Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jul 1; 113(1):69–76. - PubMed
    1. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. JAMA. 1993 May 5; 269(17):2282–6. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources