Use of polymerase chain reaction on pooled cervical swabs to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female sex workers in Singapore
- PMID: 15858689
Use of polymerase chain reaction on pooled cervical swabs to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female sex workers in Singapore
Abstract
Introduction: Infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) is one of the commonest sexually transmitted infections (STI). As there is currently no laboratory in Singapore that offers the chlamydia culture tests, alternative laboratory methods were developed and antigen detection methods such as enzyme immunoassays (EIA) proved to be even less sensitive than cell culture. This study was done to assess the accuracy and sensitivity of pooling five endocervical swabs collected for C. trachomatis testing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology, as compared to the currently used EIA on individual swabs, in female sex workers who were seen at a STI clinic in Singapore.
Methods: A total of 1,182 endocervical swab specimens were analysed by EIA as well as in pools of five specimens using PCR. Any pool with a positive PCR result for C. trachomatis infections was subjected to repeat PCR testing of the five individual specimens in the pool.
Results: There were a total of 48 confirmed cases of C. trachomatis infection. EIA detected 19 positive samples for C. trachomatis, yielding a prevalence of 1.6 percent among the sex workers tested. Pooled PCR testing showed a higher prevalence rate of 4.1 percent, with 48 PCR positive samples. All cases that were EIA positive were also PCR positive. Individual runs on 200 random samples as well as on 220 individual samples from positive pooled results showed PCR inhibition rates ranging from 1.5 percent to 2.3 percent. However, the PCR inhibition rate was 0 percent with the use of pooling. Sensitivity of EIA was 39.6 percent, with 100 percent specificity. EIA tests had a false negative rate of 60.4 percent. PCR was found to be 100 percent sensitive and specific.
Conclusion: C. trachomatis infections among female sex workers attending the clinic were found to be higher using PCR technology. Less sensitive methods such as EIA result in undertreatment of otherwise undetected cases. The pooling strategy using pool sizes of five specimens, with a disease prevalence of 4.1 percent is reliable and cost-effective, and has since been introduced in the current medical surveillance scheme for sex workers in the clinic.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.Sex Transm Dis. 1992 Jul-Aug;19(4):193-7. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199207000-00002. Sex Transm Dis. 1992. PMID: 1411833
-
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal specimens from female commercial sex workers using a new improved enzyme immunoassay.Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Dec;74(6):435-8. doi: 10.1136/sti.74.6.435. Sex Transm Infect. 1998. PMID: 10195054 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests.J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):1751-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1751-1756.2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. PMID: 11325985 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
DFA, EIA, PCR, LCR and other technologies: what tests should be used for diagnosis of chlamydia infections?Immunol Invest. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1-2):157-61. doi: 10.3109/08820139709048923. Immunol Invest. 1997. PMID: 9037620 Review.
-
Keeping up with new technology: new approaches to diagnosis of Chlamydia infection.Clin Chem. 1996 May;42(5):809-12. Clin Chem. 1996. PMID: 8653919 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost-effective pooling of DNA from nasopharyngeal swab samples for large-scale detection of bacteria by real-time PCR.J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Mar;53(3):1002-4. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03609-14. Epub 2014 Dec 31. J Clin Microbiol. 2015. PMID: 25552360 Free PMC article.
-
The potential role of biomarkers in HIV preventive vaccine trials.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Aug 15;51(5):536-45. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181adcbbe. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009. PMID: 19512938 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials