Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
- PMID: 15860204
- DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002
Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis
Abstract
Porosity and pore size of biomaterial scaffolds play a critical role in bone formation in vitro and in vivo. This review explores the state of knowledge regarding the relationship between porosity and pore size of biomaterials used for bone regeneration. The effect of these morphological features on osteogenesis in vitro and in vivo, as well as relationships to mechanical properties of the scaffolds, are addressed. In vitro, lower porosity stimulates osteogenesis by suppressing cell proliferation and forcing cell aggregation. In contrast, in vivo, higher porosity and pore size result in greater bone ingrowth, a conclusion that is supported by the absence of reports that show enhanced osteogenic outcomes for scaffolds with low void volumes. However, this trend results in diminished mechanical properties, thereby setting an upper functional limit for pore size and porosity. Thus, a balance must be reached depending on the repair, rate of remodeling and rate of degradation of the scaffold material. Based on early studies, the minimum requirement for pore size is considered to be approximately 100 microm due to cell size, migration requirements and transport. However, pore sizes >300 microm are recommended, due to enhanced new bone formation and the formation of capillaries. Because of vascularization, pore size has been shown to affect the progression of osteogenesis. Small pores favored hypoxic conditions and induced osteochondral formation before osteogenesis, while large pores, that are well-vascularized, lead to direct osteogenesis (without preceding cartilage formation). Gradients in pore sizes are recommended for future studies focused on the formation of multiple tissues and tissue interfaces. New fabrication techniques, such as solid-free form fabrication, can potentially be used to generate scaffolds with morphological and mechanical properties more selectively designed to meet the specificity of bone-repair needs.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT.Biomaterials. 2007 May;28(15):2491-504. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.046. Epub 2007 Feb 20. Biomaterials. 2007. PMID: 17335896
-
Bone formation on the apatite-coated zirconia porous scaffolds within a rabbit calvarial defect.J Biomater Appl. 2008 May;22(6):485-504. doi: 10.1177/0885328207078075. Epub 2007 May 10. J Biomater Appl. 2008. PMID: 17494967
-
Microcellular polyHIPE polymer supports osteoblast growth and bone formation in vitro.Biomaterials. 2004 Aug;25(18):3991-4000. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.086. Biomaterials. 2004. PMID: 15046889
-
Manufacture of degradable polymeric scaffolds for bone regeneration.Biomed Mater. 2008 Jun;3(2):022001. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/3/2/022001. Epub 2008 Jun 3. Biomed Mater. 2008. PMID: 18523339 Review.
-
Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials. 2006 Jun;27(18):3413-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039. Epub 2006 Feb 28. Biomaterials. 2006. PMID: 16504284 Review.
Cited by
-
Silk Fibroin/Collagen/Chitosan Scaffolds Cross-Linked by a Glyoxal Solution as Biomaterials toward Bone Tissue Regeneration.Materials (Basel). 2020 Aug 4;13(15):3433. doi: 10.3390/ma13153433. Materials (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32759746 Free PMC article.
-
An Elastic Mineralized 3D Electrospun PCL Nanofibrous Scaffold for Drug Release and Bone Tissue Engineering.ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):3639-3648. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.1c00134. Epub 2021 Mar 23. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021. PMID: 33969280 Free PMC article.
-
Order versus Disorder: in vivo bone formation within osteoconductive scaffolds.Sci Rep. 2012;2:274. doi: 10.1038/srep00274. Epub 2012 Feb 17. Sci Rep. 2012. PMID: 22355786 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional bio-printing and bone tissue engineering: technical innovations and potential applications in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery.Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jun 3;42(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00263-6. eCollection 2020 Dec. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 32548078 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Design and study of additively manufactured Three periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structured porous titanium interbody cage.Heliyon. 2024 Sep 20;10(18):e38209. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38209. eCollection 2024 Sep 30. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39364254 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical