Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Apr;67(4 Spec No):374-7.
doi: 10.1136/adc.67.4_spec_no.374.

Central venous pressure in the ventilated neonate

Affiliations

Central venous pressure in the ventilated neonate

J R Skinner et al. Arch Dis Child. 1992 Apr.

Abstract

As there is no other measurement of right ventricular preload, central venous pressure (CVP) measurement provides unique and important haemodynamic information. CVP is not measured routinely in neonatology and there is a shortage of data in the ventilated neonate. CVP was measured in 62 ventilated neonates. Thirteen had respiratory disorders (28-42 weeks' gestation, birth weight 860-4390 g) and 49 had congenital heart disease (birth weight 1600-4500 g, age 0.5-30 days). Data from other case reports are also presented. In the babies with respiratory distress, a value of zero was associated with clinical evidence of hypovolaemia and negative values, common in the unventilated neonate, did not occur in those who were ventilated. Values over 7 mm Hg were found in babies with evidence of myocardial dysfunction or persistent fetal circulation but were also found with transmitted high intrathoracic pressure, such as with pneumothorax. In the babies with congenital heart disease, values mostly lay between 4 and 8 mm Hg. Values outside this range, particularly above 8 mm Hg, were usually associated with profound metabolic acidosis, suggesting circulatory failure. While the main use of CVP measurement is in trend analysis, this report suggests that single measurements can be of value, though correct interpretation will depend on the context in which they are made.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1990 May;79(5):513-7 - PubMed
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1985 Aug;60(8):710-3 - PubMed
    1. Arch Dis Child. 1990 Jan;65(1 Spec No):24-6 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Feb;15(2):446-56 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Res. 1981 May;15(5):874-8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms