Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2005 May-Jun;9(5):667-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.12.006.

Is routine placement of surgical drains necessary after elective hepatectomy? Results from a single institution

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Is routine placement of surgical drains necessary after elective hepatectomy? Results from a single institution

Ali Aldameh et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 May-Jun.

Abstract

Routine drainage is no longer used after many major abdominal procedures. However, the role of routine surgical drainage after hepatic resection is unclear. Of the two randomized trials published, one concluded drainage is unnecessary after hepatectomy, and another concluded it could be used after major resections only. Between January 1999 and December 2003, 211 elective hepatic resections were performed by two surgeons at Auckland Hospital. Drains were used routinely by one surgeon (n = 126), while another routinely did not drain (n = 85). Patients undergoing a biliary reconstruction were not included in this analysis. Patient and clinical data were recorded prospectively, and no outcome analyses were performed until 2004. The demographic features were similar between the drained and non-drained groups. There were no differences in length of hospital stay (no drain, 7 +/- 0.8 days; drain, 7 +/- 0.9 days: P = not significant [NS]), in mortality (no drain, 1.2%; drain, 1.6%: P = NS), biliary fistula (no drain, zero cases; drain, two cases: P = NS), or overall complication rate (no drain, 50.5%; drain, 54.7%: P = NS). Both groups had similar rates of postoperative collection (no drain, four patients [5%]; drain, five patients [4%]: P = NS), and there was no difference in the use of percutaneous drainage of collections between the groups (no drain, four patients [5%]; drain, two patients [2%]: P = NS). Multivariate analysis showed that intraoperative blood loss of 2000 ml or greater (relative risk [RR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.75; P < 0.01), number of segments resected (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.21-1.89; P < 0.01), and presence of steatosis/fibrosis or cirrhosis (RR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.01-2.1; P < 0.05) to be predictive of postoperative complications. The presence of a surgical drain was not predictive of complications. Routine surgical drainage after elective hepatectomy is not necessary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arch Surg. 1998 Mar;133(3):309-14 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1994 Jun;167(6):593-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1989 Dec;210(6):748-50 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1996 Jan;171(1):158-62 - PubMed
    1. N Z Med J. 2001 Nov 23;114(1144):516-9 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources