Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 May 3;45(9):1428-34.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.035.

Effects of left ventricular assist device therapy on ventricular arrhythmias

Affiliations
Free article

Effects of left ventricular assist device therapy on ventricular arrhythmias

Ohad Ziv et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: In a retrospective study, we sought to evaluate the effect of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy on ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with advanced congestive heart failure.

Background: Despite the increasing use of LVAD as a bridge to cardiac transplantation, our knowledge regarding its effect on ventricular arrhythmias is currently limited to small series. Little is known about the prevalence, predictors, and clinical consequences of ventricular arrhythmias in LVAD recipients.

Methods: We reviewed the pre- and post-LVAD course of the last 100 consecutive adult patients to receive a HeartMate LVAD (Thoratec Laboratories Corp., Pleasanton, California) at our institution. All ventricular arrhythmias sustained for at least 30 s or requiring defibrillation were analyzed. All documented pre- and post-LVAD sustained ventricular arrhythmias were classified either as monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MVT) or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF).

Results: Our population had an average age of 51 years, had predominately ischemic cardiomyopathy (63%), and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 20 +/- 10%. New-onset MVT was observed in 18 patients who did not have MVT before LVAD placement. After LVAD, new-onset MVT was 4.5 times more likely than elimination of previously present MVT (p = 0.001), whereas the effect of LVAD on incidence of PVT/VF was not significant. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, serum electrolyte abnormality was an independent predictor of post-LVAD ventricular arrhythmias. Preoperative MVT did not predict postoperative MVT.

Conclusions: After LVAD placement, there is a significant rise in the incidence of de novo MVT. By contrast, the incidence of PVT/VF was unaffected by LVAD placement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources